The "Dangerous Eaton Carcano" - A Myth Busted - Updated 2 June

Here's a pic of the two. The unfired one is .4475" at its largest near the base, the fired is .4525". OAL of unfired is 2.052", fired is 2.0765". The bullet from the unfired slips easily into the neck of the fired, which is normal.

The pic shows the shoulder on the fired is somewhat pushed up compared to the unfired, again normal.

Comments are invited. (**Edit: I was using my $6000 Cambodian Tire micrometer. **)

Carcanoshellax.jpg
 
Funny enough the jap action is even stronger. Or he could have thought he had a type I.

Wonder what a 6.5 jap would do in that action...
 
You would have won the $100 had I bet against you. So, the regurgitated story that the barrels were pressed into a barrel stub and that was the root of the "weak action" has a flaw. My other four have the same tiny (1/8") set screw to keep the barrel and stub aligned.

For you statisticians and students of logic, we have four examples of a barrel screwed into the stub, and you never know, I might have the only five prototypes that were built that way, so I draw no other conclusions than that my five examples were not pressed in. If design documents existed we might know more, but sadly they appear to have been lost.

L to R - barrel with tiny indent for set screw, barrel stub, set screw, receiver

Eaton_Carcano_Barrel_Assembly.jpg

can you give the thread sizes?
 
- According to John A. Belton (the authority on Cooey products) the Eaton Carcano were re-chambered for 6.5 Mannlicher-Schonauer and used a special reduced load the box had a pink label on it to identify it. Rifles were removed from sales after numerous accidents and litigations following these accidents.

- I met John Belton a few times when I started going to gunshows in Montreal 25 years ago, he was an Engineer and a well known gun and cartridge collector and he knew was he was talking about.

John was a real gentleman and had a mind like a bear trap. It was 10 years between our last meetings just before he passed away and he picked up the conversation where we had left off.
 
As to the strength of the Eatons Carcano.....about 50 plus years ago a couple of us in Edmonton decided to "blow one up" for giggles. Pulled the bullet on a box of Eatonia carcano ammo and filled the case with bullseye. Tied the rifle to a bren tripod and a long string pulled the trigger. nothing, nada zip. It fired and spit the bullet out the barrel. Second try was again a case full of bullseye, but a bullet (FMJ) in the case backwards and another slug pounded up the barrel about a foot. FIRE !!! Barrel departed the receiver, case disappeared other than some brass stains on the bolt face, which OPENED with a slight bump on the bolt handle. The bolt did not blow open.......... Never found the extractor even after we had covered the entire gun and tripod with a tarp. Ah yes, young and reckless.
 
My most HUMBLE apologizes...It was not John Belton who passed away.. It was Charles Prodan...... Charles has been gone for some time. I'm allowed one seniors memory lapse a week and I'm up to 2014 right now.
My apologizes to John Belton who is still at room temperature from what I understand.
 
My most HUMBLE apologizes...It was not John Belton who passed away.. It was Charles Prodan...... Charles has been gone for some time. I'm allowed one seniors memory lapse a week and I'm up to 2014 right now.
My apologizes to John Belton who is still at room temperature from what I understand.

That's O.K. Warren, just take your medecine, sit quietly and don't get excited when THEY come for you. Laugh2
.
 
My most HUMBLE apologizes...It was not John Belton who passed away.. It was Charles Prodan...... Charles has been gone for some time. I'm allowed one seniors memory lapse a week and I'm up to 2014 right now.
My apologizes to John Belton who is still at room temperature from what I understand.

uh oh...

Th phone message I just left is going to seem awfully silly!

My Mom told me I couldn't believe everything on the internet!
 
kjohn, my Carcano has CAL. 6.5 on the rear sight as well. I picked it up a while back, but I'm not sure if it's an "Eaton" or just a normal milsurp. The boxes of Norma 156 gr. simply say 6.5 Carcano on the box.

Your registry story could start another thread if one doesn't already exist. When I bought my last AG42B Ljungman the fools in Miramichi had it catalogued as "Unknown European Semi-automatic 6.5 mm"!!!

As for your photos, the brass on the left certainly appears longer. And by my crude measuring on the screen, the shoulder appears about 5 degrees steeper.

For what that's worth.
 
Your registry story could start another thread if one doesn't already exist. When I bought my last AG42B Ljungman the fools in Miramichi had it catalogued as "Unknown European Semi-automatic 6.5 mm"!!!


My Ljungman was originally registered by my brother (I was away from Ontario)
, and he didn't know what it was...Actually registered as "Torped Overslag"!

Mr. Belton thanks all those concerned, he is still among us with no plans on leaving!
 
Old thread that needed to be revived..not to be questionend but to be read by anyone who hasnt' yet. Im looking a buying one of these Cooey Carcanos locally right now...seems like a handy little gun. I wish I could get my hands on a couple pieces of 6.5x54 MS brass pieces or loaded ammo so I can do a little testing before I buy expensive dies/brass .

I agree a lot of the problems with these rifles would likely have to do with people using the wrong ammunition...a proper barrel stamp could of gone a long way.
 
Governments spend far more money and time developing rifles and cartridges that any private company can afford.

The European pressures and proof pressures for the 6,5 x 52 Carcano and the 6,5 x 54 M.-Sch. are found here;

C.I.P.

COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE PERMANENTE
POUR L'EPREUVE DES ARMES A FEU PORTATIVES

From = https://bobp.cip-bobp.org/en/tdcc_public
 
As to the strength of the Eatons Carcano.....about 50 plus years ago a couple of us in Edmonton decided to "blow one up" for giggles. Pulled the bullet on a box of Eatonia carcano ammo and filled the case with bullseye. Tied the rifle to a bren tripod and a long string pulled the trigger. nothing, nada zip. It fired and spit the bullet out the barrel. Second try was again a case full of bullseye, but a bullet (FMJ) in the case backwards and another slug pounded up the barrel about a foot. FIRE !!! Barrel departed the receiver, case disappeared other than some brass stains on the bolt face, which OPENED with a slight bump on the bolt handle. The bolt did not blow open.......... Never found the extractor even after we had covered the entire gun and tripod with a tarp. Ah yes, young and reckless.


PO Ackley did a similar test on several different Carcano rifles to determine their strength and came to the conclusion that the actions were very strong. Easily as strong as any other action of their era.

His decision as to why the Italians loaded it to anemic specs was that it was easier for their troops to handle and gave less wear to the rifles.

Andy, this recent resurrection of this thread, piqued my interest and I read back to the beginning, where you performed your experiment.

I mentioned I had a Carcano carbine chambered for the 8x57 cartridge and used full power 8x57 ammo in it.

You replied that some of your buds in the US cautioned you to use light loads.

I did some checking on these rifles. Even spoke to an old Austrian Hitler Youth member that was issued one of these during the closing days of WWII. He hated it, not because there was anything wrong with it, but because it kicked like a mule, which I can fully attest to.

His name was Eric Grubel and he was from Wein (Vienna). Lives in Hungary now.

He did mention that some of the rifles wouldn't chamber the rounds they were issued, which were on similar enblocs as the 7.5 and 6.5 chambered rifles. It seems that in their hurry, or maybe because of slave labor sabotage, some of the rifles had chambers that weren't deep enough and others were cut to deep.

Just about all of these rifles went to Sudan, where they were used for drill purpose and training. That's why all that I've seen, look beat to hell on the outside, but are almost pristine internally.

During WWII, the Japanese purchased Carcano rifles that were purpose built for their purpose. It was called the Type II.

The Type II Carcano has a Japanese style trigger guard and magazine that doesn't require enblocs and looks just like those on their own Arisaka rifles. The Type II rifles also have a two piece butt, just like the Arisaka.

Here's where the tire hits the road. The Type II rifles are of course chambered for the Japanese standard 6.5x52, with a standard .264 bore. The 6.5x52, with 156 grain bullets, was loaded to 2400 fps by the Japanese. That's appx 200 feet per second faster than the Italian round.
 
The Japanese round was actually the 6.5x50, not 52.

Yes, a typo. I guess because I had the Italian round on my mind???

That doesn't negate the fact that the Japanese loaded their shorter round hotter, without any issues in the Japanese Carcano Type II receiver or barrel, which was dimensionally similar to the Italian Carcano.
 
Back
Top Bottom