The fading .40 S&W

Whatever you shoot best, right? Shot placement trumps ballistics every time. And as others have noted, the major pistol cartridges all have "sufficient" ballistic performance.

EXCEPT for when it comes to barrier penetration. But I don't really view that as a handgun property, to be honest. If you need to shoot through a wall or tempered glass, you should really have a shotgun with slugs. If you think that's something that a handgun should be able to do, then you have to consider the question very carefully.
 
This is just another excuse for police departments to spend more money.

Sorry Mr. Taxpayer. We have no choice but to buy all new firearms for the entire department. Add that to the ever increasing police budget.
 
as much as I sometimes dislike James Yaeger, I have to agree with that vid of his. the .40 cal was the answer to a problem that never needed to exist. If the cops couldnt handle the big 10mm, they should have gone to 9mm or 45acp. plus, they are snappier and follow up shots are harder to get. Thats why no cops/feds anywhere are carrying 357 or 44 magnum revolvers or semiautos, even if they have the option to pick and carry their own gun and ammo choice. Plus, 357 sig and .40cal are both high pressure rounds. they WILL wear out your gun faster, especially if you put a lot of rounds downrange like many pros do. Its that simple.
 
Police departments across the U.S. are facing budget cuts as taxpayer revenues continue to fall. This results in reduced dollars for training and supplies and reduced numbers of officers. A police officer with limited pistol training is going to score better with a 9mm than the 40S&W because of reduced recoil. As the story said, the crux of the matter is falling qualification scores for police officers, and that's why the change.

Let's face it, how many times a year does the average U.S. police officer have to shoot someone? The real question is more like how many times a decade does the average U.S. police officer how to shoot someone, because the short answer is, they don't. Their job isn't shooting people, it's enforcing laws. They need to meet the minimum requirement for marksmanship and that's it, from a realistic, practical perspective. And changing to 9mm will make that a little easier in times that are tight for money.
 
Dont shot pistols but me and one of my friend are shooting carbines in 10mm Thureon defence for me and JR 40 S&W for my friend and with my full trottle reloads and him with is full trottle reloads often make comparaison on water bottles, cinder blocks, piece of lumber and all the time the 10mm is in front, the first analogy that come to mind if you compared those 2 calibers out of carbine lenght barrel would be 22 mag compare to 22 LR, and even more i suspect the 10mm to be on par with a 357 mag out of a carbine, but this i have to verify over the P35 but if it's not on par it is dam close... JP.
 
I'm an old guy with old ideas, so If I found that neither the 9mm or the .45 was suitable, and the use of a long gun was inconvenient, I'd probably go with either a .38 Super or a 10mm. The .40 just doesn't seem to have a niche, having neither the frontal area of the .45 nor the velocity of the Super or the original 10. Apparently I need to find a Colt Delta.
 
Me, I like the .40 S&W.....

Jay said:
I shoot 22LR, 9mm, 7.62x25, 40 S&W and 45Auto as pistol calibers, LOVE EM ALL!!!

Cheers
Jay
Click to expand...

All of the above, except the 7.62 Tok as I have yet to own a pistol in that.

Plus, .25ACP; .32 ACP; .380 ACP; .38 ACP; .38 Super; 9mm; 10mm; .41 Mag; .44 Mag; .45 LC & .455 Webley/Eley/Colt.

That all said, my well used 2nd gen G22 .40 S&W would still be my "go to" [if necessary].

:canadaFlag:
-----------
NAA.
 
I loved my 10mm when I had it...I love my three 9mm's (fourth on the way)...If I had a 40 S&W I'm pretty sure I'd love it too.

Best group I fired from a pistol was from my Glock 20.

The scourge of the human race is fashion...need something new to sell and occasionally it turns out to be better, only to be tossed aside in a few years for something the same, a tiny bit better, or a tiny bit worse. It was pretty much all done 30-40 years ago, any improvement now will require a leap in energy storage.

Not to infer I don't like variety, just accept that what I like and need are not the same thing.
 
Last edited:
The 40 is very common in the competition shooting world. I don't see a mass exodus to the 357 sig for shooters looking to make major PF. Unless there is a significant rule change 40 will be around for this reason alone.
Just say'n
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom