The FN FNX 45 Tactical: thoughts and observations **50m Range Report on Post 11**

Master-G

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
313   0   0
Location
Halifax
GYzZ0Dn.jpg

After an 18-month wait I finally had my cataract surgery in January. One of the downsides was that I didn’t have quite as much near-focus vision as I’d had before…not that much less, but enough that regular pistol sights were a little more out of focus for me. I’ve been using reading glasses for the past year or so so it wasn’t a huge change, but it was enough that it gave me the idea to try a pistol with a compact optic. I’ve been using red-dot sights on my black rifles for years, but I hadn’t tried a handgun with one. I picked up a couple of Trijicon RMRs off the EE, and both a Glock 17 MOS and FX FNX 45 Tactical from a couple of site sponsors. I figured the Glock would be quite familiar to everyone, but the FNX maybe less so—I had never even seen a newer-gen FN pistol like their FNP, FNX or FNS lineup until mine showed up. Here are some thought after the first week.

I picked up the FDE model—the appearance of the colour varies a fair bit depending on the light from almost an olive colour to a caramel brown. The “Tactical” version of the FNX varies from the regular version, I think, by having a longer (5.3” vs. 4.5”) barrel, higher “suppressor” night sights, and a slide pre-milled for compact optic mounting.

It’s a full-size pistol for sure—the normal cap magazines holds an impressive 15 rounds of .45 ACP. I was apprehensive about the grip size but it’s surprisingly manageable—the extra capacity is achieved not by increasing the grip’s girth but by having a grip that is longer than other comparably-sized pistols. The grip circumference is only 14.5cm, just a bit more than the 9mm Glock 17 at 14cm. It’s a very manageable grip, even with my small hands.
IV13x5H.jpg



The grip has raised grooves on the front strap and a bold pyramid-like texture on the side. I like the grooves—they let your fingers slide into a good grip easily while still providing a solid purchase. The pyramids feel, to me, more or less the same as a Gen 4 Glock…maybe a bit more aggressive.
2DKGgtz.jpg



The only grip customization is changeable backstraps. What’s neat is that in addition to two different shapes (straight and curved) you have a choice of textures (grooved or pyramids)—I don’t know if any other pistols have this feature.
388iLQB.jpg



I’ve got the straight-backed pyramids on mine. (Is that a lanyard loop at the bottom?)
IqyDlGx.jpg



The FNX is a DA/SA pistol with a combination safety-decocker. The safety can be applied with the hammer down or cocked. It’s not quite as positive-feeling as the safety on an H&K USP, and there’s not as much of a “stop” when sweeping the safety off before activating the decocker…it feels to me like you might inadvertently decock the pistol under stress. The slide release is a Glock-style nub that’s protected by inadvertent activation by some protrusions. I prefer a larger-to-activate slide release myself. It seems that smaller slide releases might be becoming more common—my SIG P226 Legion has a similarly small one. I guess the modern thing to do is the slingshot slide release but I prefer a slide-stop release. The rear suppressor sight is significantly higher than the normal sight. The bore axis is quite low, too. I'm not a "low bore axis at all costs" guy, but all things being equal, a low bore axis is better.
XFd7bX4.jpg



Controls—even the mag release—are ambidextrous. the mag release is your typical push button release, not a H&K or Walther paddle-style one (which I would have preferred).
ZFckwMW.jpg



The trigger is smooth and there are no humps or grooves inside the trigger guard (I hate those on the HK45 or SFP9). There’s a molded-in overtravel stop on the trigger (but what’s funny is that there’s still significant overtravel after the break).
uOvdl1f.jpg



Here’s a quick demo of the trigger pull—I like it.
[youtube]ZsluAo1Wwy8[/youtube]

The front sight is, of course, tall as well. A thread protector is included…this would be an awesome pistol for a suppressor!
bgXkfuu.jpg



Here’s the sight picture through the RMR (I always find it hard to get a picture that represents what your eyes see). The high sights do cover a fair bit of the RMR window. I guess that since they co-witness I should be able to zero the sight more easily. I’ve heard that seeing the sights means you can locate the red dot more easily but I’m a little dubious as to if that’s a worthwhile feature. I’d prefer, I think, if they were shorter.
A1rGpH3.jpg



There are robust-looking rails inside the frame for the slide to run on.
zKVegvM.jpg



There’s a plate on the top of the slide that you remove to reveal the drilled and tapped holes for the various optics.
ZhPwYVe.jpg



An RMR-compatible plate and screws are included (not like Glock that make you buy the screws separately. The same screws are used to mount both the sight and plate.
LweLLiO.jpg



The mags are a little odd—instead of having a notch in them there’s a small nub on the front the the mag body that engages the mag release notch. I’ve had it fetch up on the release a little a few times when inserting the mag…I’m a little concerned it could sometimes be an impediment to a smooth mag change. All three mags had the same brazed area—it must be part of the pinning process.
dRskSb7.jpg



Disassembly is easy—lock the slide back, unscrew the thread protector, swing the disassembly lever 90°, retract the slide a bit then ease it forward. The guide rod is steel (and the mainspring quite stout).
IikrGQx.jpg



The pistol comes with a really nice case with room for extra mags, the extras mounting plates and even a suppressor (which I’m using for the trigger lock)
4YtD3AU.jpg



So, what do I think? As fas as regular DA/SA polymer pistols go I think I prefer the H&K USP—the trigger pull is a bit better, and the safety has a more positive feel (and I prefer the USP’s slide stop and paddle mag release). The trigger pull on the FNX is a bit lighter, if I remember correctly, and the FNX’s grip is more manageable. I do like the ease of mounting an RMR (which is why I bought it in the first place :)). If we were allowed normal cap mags 15 rounds would be awesome, too, as would suppressor use. As for other polymer .45s, I like the feel of the FNX better than the Glock 21 (which I find a bit large in the grip) and the HK45 (which I always found too slippery in the hand, plus the damn trigger guard groove bit my finger under recoil. I'm pleased with it so far.

With a foot of snow on the ground and another expected early next week I expect it'll be some time before i get to the range—I'll update the thread once I'e had a chance to shoot the pistol.
 
Last edited:
Nice round up op....havn't had the pleasure yet...but it is tempting...congrats ..great looking pistol.
 
I am a huge fan of the FNH FNX Tactical if .45 is the desired calibre. I actually shoot mine (configured identical to yours), better than I do my STI SS 5" M1911A1 equipped with the same optic. That's actually saying something as my STI .45 is nicely tuned. I any case, I suspect that as an experienced shòoter you will find that the FNX .45 shoots much like a 9mm in terms of perceived recoil and muzzle rise. Just a bit more flash and report going on at the muzzle, which I find moderately entertaining! Something has to make up for the extra cost of the ammo....might as well be the fireworks.

Great review so far, with terrific narrative and photography. I also enjoyed your Famae review, one of which I also happen to own. I look forward to your range report - hopefully you wiĺl share my affinity for the FNH FNX Tactical!
 
Last edited:
Something has to make up for the extra cost of the ammo....might as well be the fireworks.
Well said!

Thanks very much for the kind comments, everyone.

Something I neglected to mention is the the RMR is the 3.25MOA adjustable LED model. It's a bit finer dot than I'd prefer for pistol use (I'm thinking a 6 MOA would be perfect) but I saw this one come up on the EE and couldn't resist since it'd (more or less) match the pistol. Here's how the dot looks on target at 5m (the squares are 1" X 1").
3iq8qh0.jpg
 
I finally had a chance to take the FNX45 to the range today. I only had an hour to try out three new guns so I was a little pressed for time. Even this short shake-down, though, was enough for me to really appreciate the pistol.

I started with my usual “out of the box” test for a new pistol—10 rounds at 10m at a brisk pace (the first clip in the video below shows this string). The first thing I noticed was how mild the recoil was—my last two polymer .45 pistols were a GLock 21 Gen 4 and an H&K Mk23 and the FNX was noticeably milder in recoil than those two…surprisingly so, even. Having the co-witness sights made my at-home sight adjustment pretty close—I was pleased with this first group.

iNTmHeZ.jpg


I tried a few more magazines-full with no problems and finished off with five rounds at 25m. I was feeling a little rushed and I am pretty well out of practice—I haven’t shot at this distance since last fall and I haven’t been shooting at in in more than two months so I know this group is not representative of the pistol’s potential but I’m OK with it. The slide did not lock back on the last round for the final string, although it did when I racked the slide. This was the only issue with the pistol.

accDrPE.jpg


Here’s a comparison of the dot sizes for the 9MOA RMR on the Glock and the 3.25 MOA on the FNX (the black aiming mark on the target is 4.5” and the distance is 25m. The large dot on the Glock did not bother me—I'm not planning any long-distance shooting with the, and the green really stood out.
[youtube]ZgC4-lzHWv0[/youtube]

I enjoyed shooting this pistol very much—the recoil was a pleasant surprise and the trigger pull was easily managed, too (although there was one shot where the longish reset caught me up a little bit…it’s at the 17 second mark in the video). I had my RMR-sighted Glock 17 MOS out for the first time as well and I must say I enjoyed shooting the FNX better. Despite it being a .45 I was able to track the dot better though recoil than I was with the Glock. I’m not sure if the it was because the co-witnessed sights help re-orient me faster or because the Glock’s snappy recoil jumped the sight around. There was a few times that the Glock’s window came up that I did not know here the dot was. More shooting with both I think will help. In my earlier post I mentioned that the sights seemed a little distracting but at the range the were much less noticeable. Overall I am really pleased with the pistol.

[youtube]mLTMr_AZCGw&t=21s[/youtube]
 
nice write up!
ive been interested in that exact gun, the FN so its nice to see a write up about it and some video as well!

from watching the video's it actually looks like the Glock isnt jumping as much as i thought it would from your write up.
i wonder if its more of a 'felt recoil' than a actual get up and jump one???

im running the M&P Pro Core right now with a Delta-point on it and i really like it, it allows me to co-witness like your FN does, have you considered getting some after market sites on the Glock so you can co-witness with it as well???

i ask because i recently picked up a Glock 40 MOS and im gonna put a optic on it but im gonna wait till i can flesh out some higher sites so i can co-witness through the optic.
its a definite must for me.
 
from watching the video's it actually looks like the Glock isnt jumping as much as i thought it would from your write up.
i wonder if its more of a 'felt recoil' than a actual get up and jump one???
Yes, I think that's it. The Glock does not really recoil very much but the "snappiness" of the recoil, combined with the Glock's different grip angle, made it tougher than I thought it would be. I shot the RMR-sighted Glock today significantly worse than an "iron" sighted G17. I have got to think that more practice will help, though.

have you considered getting some after market sites on the Glock so you can co-witness with it as well???
I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle. After my eye surgery in January I wanted one .45 and one 9mm RMR-equipped pistol so I could have a couple of pistols I could shoot without handicap. The FNX has passed that test by a significant margin...but I'm not sure that the G17 MOS has. I know Glocks are very good pistols but I'm not sure if they're still right for me.
 
the hassle shouldnt be too bad to get sights that would allow you to co-witness.
i know as i get older the higher the iron sights on my pistols the easier i can shoot it and the better i shoot it.
its not like i have to worry about the high sights getting caught up in my waistband as we cant carry up here so thats a non issue.
for example, i recently picked up a Glock 19 with the threaded barrel and extra high suppressor sights, love the high sights!
so easy to find with my eyes when i bring the pistol up.
same with my M&P PRO Core with the Delta-point.

like i said im gonna swap out the sights on my new Glock 40 first thing before i even go looking for a RMR for it.

and thanks again for the indepth on the FN, really have been thinking long and hard on getting one of those, really like the looks of them.
my dad has the FN FiveseveN and its very similar looking to your 45 - thats what got me going down the FN way of thinking.
 
I just picked up a FN FNX two tone, stainless and black with night sights....got it brand new at a gun auction for $790 plus 10% auction fee....sweet gun.....in good old 45acp....
 
I unexpectedly had a chance to go to the range for a bit this evening—I only had 21 rounds of .45ACP in the house but I didn’t want to pass up the chance to try some 50m shooting. I was short of time last range trip and didn’t get to try the pistol at longer distances. More time, less ammo tonight!

I checked when I got home and found that I haven’t fired a pistol at 50m since my last competition in 2011 so I am for sure a little out of practice! I tried the one superfluous round into the sand backstop just to check on the sight’s zero—it looked to be pretty close.

I tried three groups of five rounds from the prone position—the longish grip and rounded mag basepad made it easy to rest the pistol on my shooting mat. I was pleased with the pistol’s performance—the trigger pull seemed to be even longer than before, but it was manageable.

Here’s the best group (I was aiming at the target's "neck":

dewFPtD.jpg



I put each new target over the previous one for each five round group—once I was done I removed the final two targets—here are all 15 rounds from the three groups. I'm pleased!

OxL3D42.jpg


This was the first time I’ve used a pistol-mounted sight at any distance past 25m—it really made it easy to get a good sight picture. I was surprised at the results—even being way out of practice I was shooting the FNX about as good as I’d ever shot a handgun at 50m—maybe better!

I finished off with the final five rounds quickly at 7m as fast as I could pick up the dot just to get that slow shooting out of my system.


AJydRUQ.jpg



[youtube]uNSpUhL_CYk[/youtube]
 
Nice! I have never shot at 50, but that looks like a fine grouping to me :)
I don't own a .45, but if I were to get one I would seriously consider this, great looking gun imho
 
Back
Top Bottom