The Hunting Marksman

Boomer

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Uber Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
21   0   0
In the context of North American Big Game Hunting, if we define a good shot as an individual able to shoot up to his rifle, how many hunters qualify, and under what conditions do they qualify?.

North America is a very big place, and local conditions can result in some very challenging shooting problems. The whitetail deer hunter often fires at close range, but the shot must often be made quickly, and snap shooting does not lend itself to pin point accuracy. Antelope hunting on the western plains can present many of the problems associated with long range shooting such as range estimation, wind and mirage problems. Along coasts, rivers, and lake shores game such as moose and bear are taken from the bow of a pitching boat. Game typically encountered in the mountains - elk, sheep, or goats may present an opportunity, only if the hunter can work out the problems associated with a high angle shot, assuming that is, that he can get his breathing and heart rate to a point that any shot is possible after that hard climb.

The ubiquitous advise is that you should be able to hit a pie plate sized target with your first shot, and when you can no longer do so - you have exceeded your maximum range. While this does not appear difficult at first, upon examination we see that it means that your first shot must never land more than 4" from where you intend - regardless of range, wind, light, weather, or how you hold your tongue. The problems of range estimation and trajectory may become complex, but we can accommodate ranging difficulties by sighting our rifles so that the bullet does not rise above or fall below this 8" circle out to a maximum range determined by the trajectory of our bullet. Thus sighted, a .30-06 will print approximately 2" high at 100 yards, zero at 250, and 8" low at 300. Cartridges of lower velocity will have less reach, while cartridges of higher velocity may reach slightly further. While game can and has been taken at longer range, 300 yards is a reasonable limit for the hunter without specialized equipment.

If our typical hunter gets a shot at 300 yards, how well is he likely to do? First, let’s give our hero the benefit of the doubt, and agree that his rifle-scope- ammo combination is accurate to 1 MOA. Further let's say that he is a competent shot, and is able to shoot up to his rifle’s 1 MOA from prone, 4 MOA off hand, and 2 MOA from supported field positions. And lets plunk our guy in Northern Quebec with caribou as the quarry. Typical for fall in that country, the weather is hovering just above freezing, most of the snow from the night before has melted, rain squalls pushed by a 10 MPH wind move through, and although the day has the occasional sunny break, fog banks move in, although they are often short lived. The terrain is treeless and low rolling hills provide the opportunity to see great distances. Difficult walking is experienced in the wet tundra which separates the hills. Our hunter is comfortable while walking, but when he stops to glass, it isn’t long before he starts to shiver slightly, unless the sun peeks out to warm him.

Sure enough he spots a small herd in the distance, just as the fog closes in once again, but he reasons that if he can get to the next hill top he might be within 200 yards. He races to the next hill top, and is out of breath from the exertion when he flops down to look over the crest. The caribou were feeding, but moved away, and now there appears to be about 300 yards separating them. There is a nice bull in the group, and he wants to try for it. He gets himself into a sitting position so he can see over some boulders, which he discovered prevents him from shooting from prone. He knows that his bullet will drop, but it shouldn’t drop more than a hand span. He discounts the quartering wind, which he reasons will - if anything - move the bullet from the shoulder to the lung. He holds on the shoulder half way up the body of the broadside bull and fights to control his breathing and steady the wobbling cross hairs. Fog begins to swirl in his field of view, it’s now or never, and just as he presses the trigger, he begins to shiver . . . “BOOM!”

How does he do? Let’s examine that. We know that the rifle will shoot 1 MOA, and that our hunter can hold 2 MOA from a rested position, however, he starts to shiver at the shot, and this may or may-not influence the shot. The full value wind at 10 MPH will move the bullet 2 MOA, and a quartering wind will move the bullet 1.75 MOA, but our hunter has not allowed for that. If we add up the variables, we see that the bullet should land within a 4.75 minute (14.25") circle - or within roughly within 7" of his point of aim. If his range calculation is plus or minus 10% that could change the outcome dramatically. If the actual range was only 270 yards, the bullet drop would be 5", so his aiming a little high would put the bullet impact on a horizontal plane right where he wanted it. However, if the range was actually 330 yards the bullet would drop a foot, and his hold would probably result in a wound or a miss. The wind could shift his bullet as much as 5 inches, and his shivering is a wild card - only he knows his sight picture as the trigger broke.

Clearly it is better to be lucky than good, but the question for CGN’s is - Was the shot prudent?
 
Last edited:
I don't think that shot for that hunter would be "prudent" It sounds like he is not prepared for long range shooting or hunting the north. With proper clothing to prevent shivering, a laser rangefinder, some sort of rest(backpack,bipod) and more practice shooting in the wind I am sure that shot is more then possible. I know a lot of guys that only go to the range when it is calm and then they only shoot from the bench at know distances. They talk lots of #### about how they are better then snipers, but when they go hunting under "real world" conditions they miss more often then not. I always get funnly looks when I am shooting offhand @ the range but all that stops when they see me shoot the 4 inch gong @ 200 meters.
 
Was the shot prudent... not for Joe Average. Would Joe average take that shot.... probably.
I think your point is well made Boomer.
Lots of guys have a meager understanding of their rifles ballistic capabilities. And lots more have some understanding but little practical experience.
If any hunter hopes to shoot to his rifles capabilities he needs to shoot it a lot under all conditions. Range time is important and field time equally so.
It's a tall order that few achieve I am sorry to say.
 
There is a nice bull in the group, and he wants to try for it.
My initial reaction is NO way.

If this just about shooting a nice bull and not a GREAT bull - then NO.

Way too many variables that were against the shooter. Balistics knowledge, actual distance, shooting position, the fog, the wind, the prior physical exertion = NO.



There are so many other factors that can determine taking the shot as well.

Where was he in the timeframe of his hunt - middle NO, end - MAYBE.

Is it the first or second animal? If it is his second, I would say NO, his first MAYBE.

Up until this point, were the animals plentiful? If yes then NO. If not, then MAYBE.

Desperation and self confidence can heavily mitigate these decisions as you can see.
 
adog said:
I don't think that shot for that hunter would be "prudent" It sounds like he is not prepared for long range shooting or hunting the north. With proper clothing to prevent shivering, a laser rangefinder, some sort of rest(backpack,bipod) and more practice shooting in the wind I am sure that shot is more then possible. I know a lot of guys that only go to the range when it is calm and then they only shoot from the bench at know distances. They talk lots of s**t about how they are better then snipers, but when they go hunting under "real world" conditions they miss more often then not. I always get funnly looks when I am shooting offhand @ the range but all that stops when they see me shoot the 4 inch gong @ 200 meters.

in quebec? i dont believe laser range finders are nesscesary!
 
I agree wholeheartedly that for this particular individual it is not a prudent shot. I personally shoot the 300 meter gong offhand and usually send various loads downrange by the 1000's every year. I use my heavies for gophers too. I used to get a lot of strange looks when I was out after gophers with the 338 or 375 H&H.They all have some smart comment when I am connecting on the little targets at extreme ranges. Nothing can take the place of proper training and practice. A good laser is a worthwhile investment too. I have seen too many NIMRODS out in the field that couldn't hit the inside of a barn with a scattergun. It wouldn't hurt my feelings a bit if the powers that be started a hunter proficiency program that set a minimum requirement for hunters in the accuracy department. The key is, IF YOU ARE NOT SURE DON'T SHOOT. The creatures that you are firing upon are a living, breathing and feeling entity that deserves a quick clean kill if you are after it. IMHO if someone that doesn't have the ability or equipment to take the long shot does, then they are a heartless bastard that don't care about anything besides themselves.
 
Quebec must be a really "special" place if a range finder isn't a good idea. I have hunted caribou in northern Labrador personally, and it is just as flat and wide open as Estevan Sask. So for some reason I can't see northern Quebec being any different from northern Labrador. Which is where the author of the original post said his "hunter" was hunting.

X2 brobones your last 4 sentences sum it up perfectly.
 
brobones said:
It wouldn't hurt my feelings a bit if the powers that be started a hunter proficiency program that set a minimum requirement for hunters in the accuracy department

The problem with that senario is that those that can't shoot, (& we have one in our camp) due to circumstances, never has to shoot farther than
100', he manages to get his deer. Now if a proficency test was required he'd probably fail! BUT would it be fair to exclude him from hunting when under his circumstances his skill level is just fine!

I know & agree to what your saying but there's always exceptions.
There's also a very good target shot in the camp that won't shoot at a moving target because he just can't seem to connect! his choice & I respect him for that :)
 
Well said senior....I agree, as long as a hunter understands his limitations and abides by them. Unfortunately this is not always the case... some guys are snipers in their own minds.
 
I have said on occasion that I would favour a proficiency test with the firearm which was to be hunted with, however, as yet I have not figured out how that could be accomplished in a fair yet meaningful way. If all you had to do was shoot at a broadside deer silhouette at a known distance I wouldn't see the point. But if you had to shoot at a non broadside 3D deer silhouette, partially obscured, at an unknown range, with the terrain determining what position you had to shoot from, under a time constraint, but you had the right to say - "I'd pass that one up, let's move on," that, I think that could be worth while. Such a test would of course never be adopted, due to the cost and time involved, but it sure would get people thinking in terms of practical rifle shooting again! Perhaps it could be worked into a hunter's marksmanship course, and individuals who passed the course could qualify for a second tag free - or some other inducement from the game department in the participating province. Thus, it could not be construded as being a heavy handed antihunting move by the government.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom