This one got me scratching my head, figured I would share it. In the past 6 months or so I bought a new Savage model 16 WW and a new Savage model 11 Lightweight Hunter both in 260. I know, that's kinda weird but I had some kind of justification at the time. lol Anyways I had had the 16 for a few months and just had time to put a load together before hunting season with 120gr ttsx. Shoots them like a house on fire... even got to take a deer with the combo. Then early in the new year I buy the little Lightweight Hunter. I get it home and zero the scope with some factory Federal Fusion stuff, it shot them quite well around MOA which as it turned out so did the model 16 previously. So kids don't try this at home... but I tried one of my ttsx handloads for the other rifle. Shooting over the chrony I find velocity in a very safe place so I fire two more. Nice! less than an inch kinda cool I thought.
So then I'm thinking two rifles same manufacturer same year of manufacture its not surprising that they'd have the same chamber specs. I decide to work on a load for both of them at the same time with Accubond long range 129gr. First I do a max OAL measurement for each rifles. I come up with a mere .002 inches between the two. OK, this is adding up. Next I take two empty cases one fired in each rifle. I slowly chamber each of them in the model 16. Takes them both just fine not much resistance brass looks great afterwards. Then I do the same in the other rifle, same deal. So now Im thinking just maybe the same accubond load will be happy in both rifles just like the same ttsx load was, only stands to reason right...
Wrong. The model 16 is spraying these things all over the place...ladder test and 3 shot same charge groups, like 3 inch groups! Ive played with OAL from 20 to 70 thou off the lands to try and find something respectable todays attempt were 5 inch groups FFS! Unreal, the little lightweight hunter is no worse than an inch and a quarter or so with one load a very respectable .75 inch. Like I say a real head scratcher everything being so close in all other measurements and tests I was sure the results here would be at least similar
Thought I had everything cased and the answer before the test! Turns out, not so much. LOL
So then I'm thinking two rifles same manufacturer same year of manufacture its not surprising that they'd have the same chamber specs. I decide to work on a load for both of them at the same time with Accubond long range 129gr. First I do a max OAL measurement for each rifles. I come up with a mere .002 inches between the two. OK, this is adding up. Next I take two empty cases one fired in each rifle. I slowly chamber each of them in the model 16. Takes them both just fine not much resistance brass looks great afterwards. Then I do the same in the other rifle, same deal. So now Im thinking just maybe the same accubond load will be happy in both rifles just like the same ttsx load was, only stands to reason right...
Wrong. The model 16 is spraying these things all over the place...ladder test and 3 shot same charge groups, like 3 inch groups! Ive played with OAL from 20 to 70 thou off the lands to try and find something respectable todays attempt were 5 inch groups FFS! Unreal, the little lightweight hunter is no worse than an inch and a quarter or so with one load a very respectable .75 inch. Like I say a real head scratcher everything being so close in all other measurements and tests I was sure the results here would be at least similar


















































