actually, that last question was for you MWL. seems like you are qualified to address a new updated test between glock and sig with a Canadian persepctive. umm your signature.... Could you or have you already done something like this and could you publish your findings?
Although I have attended training at both the Glock factory in Georgia, the SIG Academy in New Hampshire, as well as elsewhere; am in fairly regular contact with present and former US, Canadian, and other SF, Mil and LE personnel; and done some testing with both the Glock 17/19 and SIG P226 MK25, I would not presume to know exactly why the SEALs chose the Glock 19 as their new "official" handgun, although I have heard several reasons from USSOCOM Operatives.
From a personal perspective, there are obvious differences between the two designs. Despite being more familiar with Glocks, I found that I was able to shoot the SIG slightly more accurately right out of the box. Enough to make me choose one over the other? Not really.
The SIG is obviously heavier, and a little bulkier than the Glock 19. This means that the Glock will conceal easier when required, and probably less lightly to snag on clothing or equipment when being drawn from concealment.
The controls on the SIG are not as friendly for left handed shooters, which means that for 1/5th of shooters, the Glock will probably be easier to use. for the other 4/5ths, they will find it easier to use the Glock with their weak hand, if required due to an injury or carrying or pulling another piece of gear or person.
The Glock has fewer parts, which means simpler operation, less possibility of parts failure, easier malfunction diagnosis and repair, and a smaller parts inventory required for replacements.
Those are what I would see as the main differences. Both are capable of reliably putting rounds where the user wants.
How much of this applies to the civilian shooter in Canada? Very little, in fact probably none of the above, unless you are left handed, or have a malfunctioning gun. So, should everyone run out and buy a Glock 19? Personally, I don't believe so. Will it change anything for me personally? Nope. We already have the Glock 19 in inventory, for demonstrations, etc. but it does not work as well for me as the Glock 17. It is slightly too small in my hand to be comfortable, and I shoot the 17 better. I'm also left handed, hence my choice of Glock over SIG.
So, what is the point of this thread? Nothing really, other than the OP thought the news was interesting enough to post it on CGN, starting the usual circus. What I don't really understand, is why many posters are getting their knickers twisted about what the SEALs are using.
Those of us who keep an eye on stuff have known that the SEALs have been buying Glock 19s via unit purchases for a while now, and are actually the last of the USSOCOM elements to "officially" adopt the Glock 19. What does this mean for other SF units around the world? Nothing really, they already knew about the move by US SF towards the Glock, and many have already been evaluating it, or in some cases, have already moved to using Glocks, if not as their "official" handgun, certainly it is available to them.
Just my 0.02.
Regards.
Mark