The SVT 40 Tokarev ***updated april 12th***

I have a question for the SVT guys - how do you clean your bolt? All of my other parts get a boiling water, compressed air, then G96 treatment, but is it cool to dunk the bolt in with my other parts? I want to get rid of the corrosive salts, but taking the bolt apart after each range trip seems a little excessive.
 
Last edited:
I have a question about the bolt/bolt carrier…. it seems that some of these are gold.. reddish , blued and silver… I am assuming based on some off the original WWII photos that the correct colour of the Bolt/carrier should be silver… is this correct ?
 
Great breakdown on the svt40 in this thread, thanks so much. I just picked up a 1941 Tula, 1944 avt stock with mosin style sling mount, plum bolt carrier, scope mount groves but no notch. Just about to do a full cleaning of it and this thread has been a big help with stripping and reassembly as well as general operating info. Can't wait to shoot this beauty.

Cheers!
 
Got a chance to strip an clean the cosmoline, the trigger assembly was a royal pain to re instal. Glad I knew to expect that, thought I'd share what I did to remove the stock through bolt. I took a 5mm socket and cut a slot with my dremel til it fit the bolt head, then I was able to loosen and remove it with the socket wrench. Tried to loosen it with needle nose pliers but it wouldn't budge.
 
...picked up my SVT 40 yesterday...gave it quick look-see...and thought to myself, 'Now THAT'S a rifle!'

...drove home 5 hours...checked it out before bed...the bolt would bind at the back and not cycle fully...i thought to myself that it felt like something with the spring but not knowing the inner workings i locked it up for the night and went to bed...after 21 hours awake the problem did not bother me, i slept soundly...

...this morning the rear cover did not slide forward at all, but i found a very slim screw driver and without damaging the cover or rear lug i slowly worked it in and boing! i was in business...

...the rear spring was not in its correct position but was resting farther down on the projection that comes forward from the rear lug, binding the spring rod...i set it back into place on the bolt cover...the bolt cover floated back into its correct place and that was that...

...what a fine rifle...can't wait til this winter when i can scour it and work up a load...

...thanks for this thread!

View attachment 13699
 
Last edited:
Is there any information available on bedding the SVT? I've just acquired a 1942 Tula refurb (ungrooved) and the receiver had fore-and-aft movement in the stock that was very noticeable when the trigger mechanism was detached. The only bedding information I could locate on-line (could be a search limitation) is this video, and I've shimmed behind what I think is the recoil lug as a first step.

Regards,
Joel
 
Last edited:
joelvca: Haven't found much either but I have shimmed at the rear of the receiver on several such that the cross-pin is fairly snug when it goes in. I've also felt it necessary in several cases to shim front and rear sides of the receiver. Where it gets interesting is in how you want to bed the barrel. Other forum members suggested free floating was the way to go and I've found a couple of my refurbs to be clearly and strongly floated as they came out of the crate. One of these, a former sniper, will do 1.5 inch groups at 100 yards with no difficulty, usually with 3 of the shots in about an inch. The trigger pull remains a challenge. On the other hand, the Chumak book doean't appear to mention floating in the section dealing with the supposed accuracy problems. It seems to imply the accepted barrel bedding was with up-pressure at the forend tip via the metal ring on the lower metal handguard. Chumak suggests the errant first shot problem was due to the lower guard not being firmly attached to the tip of the wood, leading to inconsistant pressure. I would say the majority of my SVT's came from refurb with up-pressure at this point which agrees with the book. As an experiment I took a regular '41 and first bedded it with strong up-pressure at the tip of forend and shot it for grouping then altered it completely to have full float (other than the junk hanging on the barrel, of course) and repeated the grouping. This is with iron sights but results showed floating to be slightly better with 2.25 inch best 5 shot group at 100 vs 2.7 inch 6 shot group for the up-pressure case. Not dramatically different and led me to conclude strong up-pressure or full float both work. What didn't work was the bedding as purchased which had the barrel barely touching the forend, loose receiver, and foot size groups. Hopefully more can be gleaned from Chumak by Russian speaking members who share their findings with us.

milsurpo
 
Last edited:
I just got mine the other day. Traded a double barrel 12 for it. But I can only partially understand the markings it has Tula markings. But a whole other set ontop of that. It has a navy AVT stock and a six port break,swivel band,bolt is silver and I have been unable to find any import markings. None of my other red rifles have as many stamps combined. any insight?image.jpgimage.jpgimage.jpg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 483
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 486
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 483
...has Tula markings. But a whole other set ontop of that. It has a navy AVT stock and a six port break,swivel band,bolt is silver and I have been unable to find any import markings. None of my other red rifles have as many stamps combined. any insight?View attachment 15108View attachment 15109View attachment 15107

The giveaways for the latest import batch are hand engraved serial numbers, laser etched German proof house marks and a plum coloured bolt carrier. The former is hard to miss, the latter can be neutralized with vinegar. I see an electropencil engraved serial number on the top of the bolt handle, so I'm going to say you have a recent import. You just need to look more carefully. (Only the Americans make importers stamp the company name on the barrel.)
 
I have a question about the bolt/bolt carrier…. it seems that some of these are gold.. reddish , blued and silver… I am assuming based on some off the original WWII photos that the correct colour of the Bolt/carrier should be silver… is this correct ?

The plum colour is a mistake in the refinishing. The originals were bare stainless steel. The refinishing chemicals react badly on stainless and red results.
 
...

9) Plum bolts.
Many test rifles, created personally by Tokarev had plum bolts. Plum bolts are also observed at some 1941 rifles. But most rifles produced before 1942 had white bolts. Mass production of plum bolts was started in 1942 in Mednogorsk

03a296ad1625.jpg

Ratnik - can you explain why almost all SVTs in Canada have plum coloured bolts, even the earliest ones? I have seen a plain steel bolt on a 1942 Finnish capture rifle.
 
You quoted explanation on why starting 1942 bolts (actually bolt carriers) are of plum colour and then asking how could 1942 Finn capture could have one.
As for your first question, most of our rifles are refurbed and that includes reblued bolt carrier.
 
Ratnik - can you explain why almost all SVTs in Canada have plum coloured bolts, even the earliest ones? I have seen a plain steel bolt on a 1942 Finnish capture rifle.

Horilka already answered you question. All rifles from recent imports are refurbs. There was no matter during refurb was rifle early or late production, all bolt carriers\bolts were blued.
But rifles in original condition, as I already wrote, have plum bolts since 1942 (or even from late 1941 according to latest finds). Finn captures rifles mostly are mismatches, and most likely it had bolt carrier from other earlier rifle. Finn captured 1942 and 1943 rifles are extremely rare, while 1941 and 1940 are very common.
 
Back
Top Bottom