I have shot now approximately 2000 rounds from my Crusader Arms - Templar Gen 1.
I wanted to share my experience with the Crusader Arms Templar Gen 1 rifle after putting 2000 rounds through it. Here's the rundown on what I've found, both the good and the not-so-good.
Accuracy:
Sub-MOA at 100 Yards: With my hand-loaded ammunition, this rifle consistently achieves sub-MOA groups at 100 yards. For a semi-auto, this is impressive, I get better groups than my R18.
Long Range Performance: Using an LPVO, hitting an 8-inch square target at 400 yards was no issue, showcasing its capability for distance shooting.
Reliability:
Initial Hiccup: Around the 300 round mark, I encountered a problem where the bolt wouldn't cycle properly. It seemed like the spring lacked the strength to fully return the bolt and chamber a new round.
Customer Service: I sent it back to Crusader Arms. They fixed it, though they didn't specify what was done. Since then, no issues whatsoever after nearly 1700 additional rounds.
Build Quality & Maintenance:
Trigger: The standard mil-spec trigger does the job for target practice. It's not match-grade, but it's reliable and feels good enough for what I need.
Durability: I make it a point to keep all screws and bolts tightened with Loctite. This has prevented any parts from loosening over time, which speaks well to the overall design's robustness when properly maintained. It is a tank, it feels well built, although the finish is not spectacular, it works and that's what matters now.
General Observations:
Recoil Management: Even with extensive shooting, the recoil management is commendable, making follow-up shots quick and manageable. This may be do to the weight of the rifle. We put a bipod and a lpvo on this rifle and it's one of our favorite rifles to take to the range.
Pros:
Exceptional accuracy for a semi-automatic rifle.
Reliable after initial fix.
Good customer service response, even if transparency could improve. I wish they had phone customer service but it's expected to be email only on startups or smaller businesses.
Solid construction that holds up well with proper maintenance.
Cons:
Early reliability issue with the bolt cycling, which might concern some users about out-of-the-box readiness.
Lack of detail from the manufacturer on the repair could be a downside for those who like to know exactly what was fixed.
I am not a fan of the slim charging handle. I wish it was a bolt style. I may CNC my own design for the handle to provide a better grip. I love that is non reciprocating.
Conclusion:
The Crusader Arms Templar Gen 1 has proven to be a fantastic rifle after overcoming an early hiccup. Its accuracy is top-notch for a semi-auto, and with the right care, it's incredibly reliable. If you're in the market for a high-performing AR-180 style rifle and are willing to possibly navigate an early issue (which might be isolated), this rifle could be a great choice. Just keep an eye on those initial rounds and ensure everything is tight and well-lubricated.
Would love to hear from others who've had experience with this rifle or similar issues with other firearms.
Hi ADLYYC - I was a relatively early adopter of the CA Crusader 9 Dual Caliber Combo. The 5.56mm upper I got with the Dual Caliber Combo package is, as far as I can tell, identical to a Gen 1 Templar upper.
I agree with most of your observations. While I wouldn't call it a "fantastic" rifle - it's definitely quite heavy and has a few idiosyncracies, but after 1600+ rounds through the 5.56mm upper and 2500+ rounds through the 9mm upper, I personally wouldn't say my particular rifle is a typical "Canadian Garbage Rod". Accuracy is good, and after a few initial teething problems related to the first gen bolt catch release lever, which were easily dealt with without a call to the warranty team, it's been completely reliable. I haven't had a single stoppage in over 1300 rounds since that was resolved.
I believe the biggest issue with the Gen 1 rifle is the weight, which is a good 1.5-2 lbs heavier than most 5.56mm rifles, and the secondary issue is communications with the company, though the Spectre Arms service department is actually quite good (at least in my interactions).
I enjoy shooting it, it's decently accurate for a gas-piston semi-auto and I can HK slap it!
My more in-depth review is here:
In case you're interested,
ADLYYC - I wrote a post on my maintenance discoveries and current routine with the Crusader 9, and since my upper is a Gen 1 Templar for all intents and purposes, they should apply for you as well:
After almost two years of ownership, I do not regret the decision to buy it. As a lower-priced, introductory rifle that I could swap uppers for and shoot both 5.56mm and 9mm it offers me the flexibility to shoot either cailber at less than the cost to buy both a NR 5.56 semi and a 9mm PCC separately. I've since purchased a Bren 2 Ms 7.62x39mm 11", and while it's very clear to see every area where the CZ rifle is superior in craftsmanship, I'm pleased that I own something that was designed and manufactured in Canada, shoots well, and behaves for me.
Now, I wouldn't buy the Crusader Crux, personally, it seems to have too many extractor issues, and the Crucible doesn't seem to have enough users yet to make clear whether it belongs in the same category, but I think that the Crusader Templar Gen 2, especially with the new stock and gas block changes mentioned above, would be a very decent non-restricted semi-auto alternative for someone who didn't want a Bren 2, X95 or Lockhart Tactical Raven.