Easy to say when packing a 375 for back up.....lol
Who's this Shoemaker guy everyone keeps quoting? Never heard of him.
Cheeky![]()
Who's this Shoemaker guy everyone keeps quoting? Never heard of him.
Could somebody post a link to Phil Shoemakers test ? or pm .thanks.
Who's this Shoemaker guy everyone keeps quoting? Never heard of him.
Have a look on 24hourcampfire, he goes by "458Win".
I've also read ( from Finn Aagaard ) that he switched to using a .458 when his .30-06 almost got him killed.
Where's the .308 choice?
Should have added too the .308 isn't quite as good as the .30-06, and the .30-06 is so uniquitous it was hard to justify including .308 when it's an obvious second and even third choice in .30 cal behind the -06 and Win Mag as an all around continental cartridge. Figured with the popularity of the .308 the snub should be properly explained. And for those who say .30-06, remember the .300 will do everything it does and more, with the added range and power.
I agree, safer to go over than under, always. I suppose it really comes down to recoil tolerance, if they're all the same to the shooter there isn't a convincing argument for me on why you should use less. I'd rather be properly gunned for the biggest game I hunt and overgunned on the smallest.
Why bother with what Aagard said? If you go here http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbth...12/Minimum_caliber_for_Kodiak_Bro#Post8871812
you'll see Phil repeatedly telling people that he's quite comfortable with clients shooting cartridges like the 06 and the 308 at coastal brown bears. And, much like in this thread, there's a bunch of people with far less - or no - bear experience telling him he's wrong. Makes for some good reading.