***this is the heat!!******

If that were not enough GSG9 - Grenzschutzgruppe 9 or Border Guard Group 9 in Germany utilized revolvers for many years, including scoped S&W M29 revolvers.[/B]
gadget

Richard Marcinko also but he chose the Model 19 357 magnum for Seal Team 6 and which he still considers one of the best hand guns for personal defense, but come on gadget, what do these specialized well trained hands on groups know.............!
 
Richard Marcinko also but he chose the Model 19 357 magnum for Seal Team 6 and which he still considers one of the best hand guns for personal defense, but come on gadget, what do these specialized well trained hands on groups know.............!

we all know that .mil or leo experience does not equate sensible choices or make them an expert..... have you not been following this thread ??

:HR:
 
I just got into some action-type competitions the last year. Did a couple IDPA matches and a 3 gun match, as well as 2 of Hungry's cqb/service rifle matches. I want to try IPSC, but haven't been able to work the Black Badge into my schedule.

I realize that not all parts of the game are tactically sound or applicable to 'my' real world scenarios or possibilities. But I'm able to work around that to get the other benefits afforded.

Competitions do not replace my regular training, they supplement range work and drills, as well as scenarios and force on force training.

While the stress is certainly not like a real shooting or high-stress situation, competition does add more stress than running range drills or working in front of your peers. So while some (tdc) may be so closed-minded that they can't see the benefits, I, and some of my peers, can.

AND they're fun :D it may have no application to the real world what so ever but who gives a flying f**k, its not meant to, its meant to be a fun way to challenge your self and come you shooting skills against others. If some people are too stuck up to have fun they can go back to modeling their gear in the mirror or put your money where your mouth is and join the men and women that serve and protect us if you want the REAL experience.
 
Guys,

Honestly thanks for the support, and the plugs for me to get involved in the competitive shooting world, but I don't want my post to be anymore of a detractor of what the this thread was about in the first place, and there was some good on topic discussion before my interlocking arcs of verbal diarrhoea.

Actually, I saw some "real world" and "practical" use of a "wheel gun", last night by Sly Stallone in the "Expendables" (God bless the missuss (wiping my tear away), it was supposed to be our date night :redface: ) That guy rocked that single action!!! pfffffft ha:
 
Ipsc

The stress can be there if you want to push and have a highly competitive mindset. I deliberately choose to compete at a lower level than some because my priorities are different. Part of my choice is due to gimpy knees and a 66 year old body. My plan at each competition is to , be safe, have fun and get my hits pretty much in that order. Some of my club guys get nervous and wound up before a match and that's OK but just not for me. A few years ago would have been different. Fortunately there's a place for everyone that wants it after completing the Black Badge course. IMO there are a few things that have no place in shooting situations and those include complacency, arrogance and false pride.
 
You talk s**t about Clerks and Supply duty, and though they may not have the firearms or ballistics experiences that you think you do, here is the difference between them and you. They, unlike you, use their spine, to get their ass and body out of bed every morning, drunk or fat, and put on a uniform to serve a greater purpose than themselves. To support us at the pointy end, so that we may be fed, paid, and supplied so we can do our job. But most of all, to serve their country, which is something I think is lost on you. How dare you call them down. I need them working in their profession, as much as they need me to provide the security so they can do it. One-Big-Team. You, use yours (spine), to hunch over a computer and look for any excuse to extend your discontent for us.


From a 20 Retired Supply Tech, I thank you.
I couldn't have said it better, or nearly as elequently.

I have invited TDC on several occasions to our IDPA matches, and he turned me down everytime.
 
+1. I can't be the only one who finds it funny that someone seen stealing just happens to have "issues" with LEOs, can I?

Can you support that claim???? If you're referring to the TSE incident, I haven't been in the building in six years. ...

What is this about? I hope this is just a misunderstanding.

Stealing, LEOs, TSE, not in the building in 6 years ... what? These words combined in a few sentences cause me concern.

I'd like some clarification on this. Am I the only one concerned with these commets? What's going on here? :confused:
 
TDC, funny enough after you again try to pass on your pearls of wisdom and condensation, I find your ass has already been handed to you here, so you tried to bounce to a "New Guy" to get your Dopamine fix for the night.

I'm merely discussing my OPINION no different than yourself or anyone else on the board.

TDC, what exactly is your issue with LEO/MIL, because it seems that any time we post anything related to our professions, you turn it into an opportunity to try to usurp, "school", and other wise talk down to us with your "vast" amount, of what seems to be non-real world, non-applied, technical and theoretical knowledge? In all the dealings I've had with you, which, not inclusive of this, are now 2. It seems to me you're looking for a fight or an opportunity to lord yourself over us by throwing ballistics tables, or facts on penetration of ballistic protective vests, using big words which I'm sure you are just aching for a chance to string into a sentence to further condescend, and otherwise talk down to professionals, which clearly you are not.

My issue with some LEO/MIL types is there immediate belief that simply because they possess a badge or MIL I.D. they believe they are all knowing and that everyone else is simply an ungrateful civilian peon. My reference to Clerks and supply Duty was an EXAMPLE of a position within the MIL or LE community that probably has little to no experience and/or expertise with small arms tactics or equipment. The EXAMPLE was not an attack on either trade nor those residing within them. The EXAMPLE was posted to stimulate thought that those with a badge or MIL I.D. may not be all knowing as some so often believe. In a nutshell it comes down to this. Don't blindly follow or believe the "experience" or "expertise" of an individual or establishment simply because they have "time in".


Honestly, reading you is like listening to a f**king Star Wars geek coming aboard and critiquing a Trekkie because Capt Kirk has a penchant for banging Alien pussy, while you jerk yourself off to the idea of you being Luke Skywalker and banging Princess Leia- "if only she would look at me!". In the way you call down and ignore our experience of firearms experience, is the same way this geek ignores that Kirk has banged copious amounts of pussy, and who gives a s**t if its blue, green or f**king rainbow coloured, its god damn pussy!!!

And in case you've lost me, I'm calling you the sister kissing wannabe who would rather roll their eyes and point the finger at those that do the job rather than get yourself laid legitimately- ie. you don't have the balls to sign on a line, put on a uniform and maybe put your firearms experience to some practical use. And we, the professionals, are the James T. Kirks of the world, banging copious amounts of alien pussy, in that we apply our firearms knowledge. We do it.

Who said anything about "no balls to sign on the line"? I choose not to join for my own reasons and it has nothing to do with not having "the balls". I guess we should sh*t talk everyone who hasn't joined or served their nation. Oh hold on, if you pay taxes I guess you could say you're serving your nation.

I never asked anyone to sign the line and serve on my behalf so don't try and put the guilt on me or anyone else for your decisions. Furthermore, no one does anything without it first serving themselves. There is no such thing as an unselfish act. You serve because you WANT to, not because you NEED to. Does your service better/serve the nation? Of course, but your service is still your decision for your personal gain. Whether that be emotional or ethical gains or physical and financial.


With supped up competition pistols, you shoot at paper and tin targets with goal of... well shooting at more paper and tin targets. With issue and service weapons, we shoot at those same paper and tin targets, but with the goal of putting down a threat by shooting at centre of mass, which requires training something else- the mindset that will allow us to let loose the death sentence that is going hit that mother ****** twice in the chest, and once in the head for good measure, all the while playing by the biggest rule changer of all- incoming fire, from a single small arms weapon, RPG or well executed ambush, that would make most ordinary men piss and s**t their pants and while worrying about wiping their ass, making them incapable of comprehending the most primal instinct to kill what is trying to kill you. And I'm guessing you fall into this category! That, is practical application. Sport shooting in a league you belong to, is an interpretation of this. And make no mistake, I respect sport shooters. Some of my best friends do both what I do, and what you do.

Simple questions beg simple answers. Not sentences and paragraphs of diatribe pertaining to science and data that overcomplicate what someone is truly looking for. We see what works, and what doesn't. We use what works, and if it doesn't change it or make due in the hopes of one day making it better- to innovate. We have the experience, either under fire, delivering fire effects, or in being prepared to do both.

So, you have no basis to call down our experience, whether we've posted 4000 times, or once. Much like I have no business schooling anyone on fat mag welled, compensated sport pistols- I don't use them. And yes, this is a Newbie, calling you out.

Ones experience does not mean one possess SME level of knowledge on any particular subject. So ones experience until validated means very little. As for post count, who the f*ck cares?!

Recognize the fact that the intended and sole purpose of firearms are to do someone harm, that would otherwise do them harm. Any thing else is ancilliary and theoretical to its use, and though I respect the dedication and application of accurate and fast fire in training, which includes IPSC, IDPA, Tactical Courses and the like (Power to ya'!), it's not the intended use of a firearm. Period.

I fully agree, I own, use, and train with my firearms with their original intended goal in mind, the defensive/offensive use against threats to my life, my family, or my nation.

You talk s**t about Clerks and Supply duty, and though they may not have the firearms or ballistics experiences that you think you do, here is the difference between them and you. They, unlike you, use their spine, to get their ass and body out of bed every morning, drunk or fat, and put on a uniform to serve a greater purpose than themselves. To support us at the pointy end, so that we may be fed, paid, and supplied so we can do our job. But most of all, to serve their country, which is something I think is lost on you. How dare you call them down. I need them working in their profession, as much as they need me to provide the security so they can do it. One-Big-Team. You, use yours (spine), to hunch over a computer and look for any excuse to extend your discontent for us.

See above, but I'll add this here. Regardless of whether or not someone wishes to call down those who serve. The very reason and nature of their service is to protect the rights of those who both support and condemn their actions. Those rights include their right to free speech. On the flip side, how dare those who serve look down on those who do not as a less worthy being.

Is your issue with LEO/MIL and your incessant need to brow beat us, based on that you couldn't make the cut? Were you too out of shape, had a medical issue, a psych issue, or simply a smarts issue that you couldn't even get recruited as a cook? Which is it.

Are you a thief? Perhaps you should clear this up for us. What exactly happened 6 years ago at The Shooting Edge, a sponsoring company of this forum, whom the owner of said store is also a proud retired CF member, that would cause you to have not stepped foot in to again? What does JR know about you, that though I'm sure he holds much insight, he is against divulging such information in that he took the high road, but it would surely draw a one hell of a light onto you by a panel of your "peers"?

This I will answer via PM if you'd like to know the basic back story but details will remain confidential. Like JR, I will not discuss such issues openly as it does not involve the masses.

I am here to learn, from the shooting professional, competitor, hobbyist, enthusiast and the like. To soak up what is useful to me, to enter into productive and concise conversation in the hopes to broaden my knowledge base, and to perhaps share what has worked, and what hasn't for me in the hopes that I may add to the ENTIRE firearms community, which includes making sure those that would do me, my family, or my countrymen harm are prevented from it. Not to post simply to raise my post count to the thousands (god willing, I'll never get that high so that I convert from doing the things I love, to talking purely talking about them), and remind people of it directly or indirectly. I'm sure this is the intent of most members on here. From what I read from what you've put here, you are here to purely lecture, to take nothing in, and force your knowledge, and though you may be this (knowledgeable), your conveyance of such knowledge, is s**t. And this, I can professionally speak to as to critique you on. What productiveness is this you offer? None.

I stir the pot and shake up the "expert" opinions to get others to think. To think for themselves and to see what validation the "experts" have for preaching what they preach.

You've been talked to by our kind, and your own, reminded, and both have put you in your place. I have otherwise been kind, and even jovial with you up until now, but you have belittled me, us and other wise picked a bone with a brotherhood that have each other's back at any given point, convenient or not, and that is stronger than anything you will ever experience,


"Our kind, and your own". That sounds like elitism at its most basic definition. Are you stating that "your kind" is vastly different and/or superior to "my kind"? What exactly is "your" and "my" kind?

You offend me. You offend those of us that serve.

Good, its entirely your right to be offended.

We are professionals. We are Warriors for those who do not want to, or cannot serve a higher purpose.

What purpose do you serve?

I live my life for me. Anyone can live for someone else's reasons or agenda. Only I can live for me.

My life for you.

Airborne.

My responses are in bold.

TDC
 
opinions are always welcome, as is discussion. However when someone starts making comments about "reality" or "real world" actions, when they have no knowledge of those things (and I'm talking about using a gun for survival, defense or offense), why would anyone take them seriously? especially when this same person then argues with people who DO know better, who DO have experience in such matters, and who ARE respected by their peers.
the pistol in question in your first post from 3 years ago was done up by SMGLee as a joke. the subsequent revolvers pictured here however (at least most of them) are suited for their intended purposes. Lets just examine one, and we'll use "real world" as our basis. Revolvers don't leave brass behind, this can be important in certain situations, be you a SOF or hitman (I suppose, not that I am either, but so I've been told and so I've read, however I admit to not being an SME on these subjects, I'll just trust that the US Navy had a small idea about they are talking about). A skilled user of a revolver can in fact keep up with a modern semi auto, and you'll find that in competitions across the world. Certainly there are things about a revolver that makes them more difficult to use for the lay user, but again, training, training, training, will sort that out. Reloads with one hand aren't really any more difficult than with a semi (revolver model dependent), nor is operation, again, training. Due to their fixed barrel, revolvers are usually more accurate than a semi auto as well, although most shooters will never be able to tell the difference.

I have yet to see anyone with a revolver(aside from Jerry Miculek) even come close to keeping up with an auto. As I asked earlier, why does IPSC and IDPA have a separate division/class for revolvers? Why are stages often designed to be "revolver friendly/neutral"??

Training can solve most problems I agree. However, the level of training required to master the revolver is far greater than that for an auto. Autos are more ambidextrous than revolvers. Autos are easier to maintain and take advantage of interchangeability of parts. Something revolvers can't claim. There are many reasons why autos are the standard over revolvers.

A single handed reload with a revolver is infinitely more difficult than with an auto. The process is the same(remove spent cartridges, insert fresh ones) but the mechanics and time involved to complete the task is excessive.

Great Rant, I give it a 10/10.... to clarify thought TDC does not compete in ANY organized sport, IDPA/IPSC or even 3 Gun according to him... he feels the rules are not realistic and he can't function is such an enviroment, so please don't compare him with people that actually participate in the shooting sports in Canada.

also of note and please everyone remember this, IDPA/IPSC and any organized Usage of your handguns in a sporting maner is one of the reasons we can still legally own firearms, sure look down at sport shooters but also realize that without that "sporting" purpose to own handguns we would be melting them all down.

As is so often the case you pepsicola know little or nothing of what I do and clearly haven't read some of my past posts. I do in fact compete, I shoot three gun matches. I cannot afford the time or finances to shoot IDPA/IPSC and as you correctly mentioned I disagree with their rules and methods. In fact a friend of mine shot an IDPA match as a guest and was ridiculed and nearly disqualified for "mag dumping" and other non safety related violations. IDPA does not represent their CCW roots and is more a game than a practical venue.

I do agree that without the shooting sports, the ability to own firearms would be much more difficult.

Lets discuss "serious work" for a minute. This revolver is marketed as part of Smith and Wesson's "Military and Police" line of products. One could only surmise that with such a target market, the product best be designed or at least geared towards hard use with a focus on reliability.

Eight rounds is pathetic. I'm sure we all know that shot placement is the critical component so the "eight rounds of .357 is superior to ..." argument is out.

Optics on a handgun is best left to the gamers

Your assessment is not correct in this regard, this revolver came about as request from a police agency, this agency had a desire for handgun that could be used as a shield gun by the entry team, having recently set a pistol up for demo and use by police and military - read Glock 17 with a Micro Aimpoint, it was very well received for use as a shield gun and other tasks.

Operating a wheel gun with one hand is a chore. Reloads aren't fast. You can't top up a wheel gun in a hurry, no tactical reload. Single loading rounds could result in several empty chambers before finding the live ones. There is no tell or sign that you've fired all rounds unless you open the cylinder and check or the gun fails to fire(which could be a bad primer as well).

Again this shows your lack of knowledge in the area of police work, the person with the shield would not reload but drop and transition to another identical revolver, referred to as the New York reload pioneered by Jim Cirillo.If you actually spent any time behind a shield you would also see how effective the revolver is in this area, since you do not have to worry about slide impacting the shield when the pistol is fired, less likelyhood of a malfunction.


I can see the revolver is well suited for "serious work". With all the user friendly attributes above, I can't see any intelligent agency/dept./unit not immediately ordering these by the truck load.

Another case of lack of knowledge regarding revolvers, what if I informed you that GIGN Groupe d'Intervention de la Gendarmerie Nationale), is the French National Gendarmerie's elite Special Operations counter-terrorism and hostage rescue unit, they still use the the Manurhin MR73 revolver for depolyment. If that were not enough GSG9 - Grenzschutzgruppe 9 or Border Guard Group 9 in Germany utilized revolvers for many years, including scoped S&W M29 revolvers.

gadget

I'm well aware of the revolvers use for the shield man. That role is a very specialized use for a revolver and not one that only a revolver can be used. The reduced risk of a stoppage is certainly an advantage of the revolver in such a role.

As for other units running revolvers, they again chose them for specialized tasks or purposes. Again, the revolver is not the only effective solution for such roles.

With specialized roles removed, the vast majority of handguns issued and used are autos. The many disadvantages of the revolver preclude them from being the best suited tool for most handgun roles.

TDC
 
My reference to Clerks and supply Duty was an EXAMPLE of a position within the MIL or LE community that probably has little to no experience and/or expertise with small arms tactics or equipment. The EXAMPLE was not an attack on either trade nor those residing within them.


If the above EXAMPLE wasn't an attack, then the part in bold that you conveniently left out in your 'explanation' was what?

...Perhaps with several years of clerk duty or working supply or drinking excessively would validate such findings...




And with that, I think I'm done in this thread....
 
Psst...TDC, please answer my questions from the my previous post in this thread, please and thanks. You seem to be avoiding it, why? You have answers for everyone but me. To be honest I feel left out.
Thanks
Eric
 
Back
Top Bottom