Thought this would have been old news by now... WRONG AGAIN

DANCESWITHEMPTIES

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Uber Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
99   0   0
I didn't figure there'd be a police department in North America left still using revolvers... Guess I was wrong!

[youtube]zw1w80vylLk[/youtube]
 
Not police but I was at our local range last year or year before and one of the armoured car services were still training with revolvers.
 
Far, far... Far from an expert. But I've read a few articles where the merits of a revolver over a pistol are argued. Some of it made sense to me. One article mentioned the benefits of revolvers for security guards. Part of it was it's public recognition & intimidation. Another was it's ability to unload & prove. The capacity doesn't play as much of a consideration, as most security guards won't go on the offensive while carrying out their job. As well as there ease of use. (These are the articles I read, not me commenting).
 
There are a few still using them but more often, in larger depts. older officers are grandfathered to allow them to keep their revolvers after semi autos are allowed for carry.

I think this was the case for NYPD, LAPD and looks like Dallas also. They have had various semi autos for some time, but some hung onto their revolvers.

In many American police depts. officers must purchase their own guns from an approved list. Other agencies issue a certain gun, but allow other personally owned guns to be carried, again from an approved list. Some are like Canadian depts. which issue guns to their members and do not allow any other guns to be carried.
 
Spoke with an officer from Michigan a couple years ago who stated that his department still a issued .357 revolver but they were allowed to buy any pistol on the agency approved list and qualify with it.
 
I'm guessing there's quite a few departments that still authorize J frames and the like as backup guns?
 
I'm guessing there's quite a few departments that still authorize J frames and the like as backup guns?

As an official armchair interweb quarterback to the whole discussion; I'd guess & say yes in the States. In Canada? I do know some Departments don't even allow off duty carry for their members. Which seems idiotic to me... And again that was some years ago I was told that & things change. I was just surprised that a patrol cop anywhere still had the ability to carry a revolver as a primary. I thought that debate died a couple of decades ago...
 
That "slide action" 94 is a scarce bird. I've not seen another. :)

It seems unlikely that a serving police officer will be embroiled in a running gun battle that requires more than 18 shots, particularly if he's been on the job 45 years and not had to shoot anyone yet. But there are real advantages to a single-sidearm policy. I get why this is happening.
 
I say be comfortable and proficient with what you carry. I train with both. If I was an LEO, and had the choice, it would be a Sig P226/9 in .40 or 9mm. But if I had to carry a revolver, I'd be fine with that too. Any number of good revolvers I'd carry, too....Python, S&W 27, 657, 686....

Accurate aimed fire, as mentioned, works best. Be trained and proficient, and hope you never need to use it.
 
Back
Top Bottom