Thoughts on my Cooper rifle

popcan

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.4%
173   1   0
images


....
Even after extensive reading about these rifles and asking a lot of questions of current owners (thanks to you all for your replies:)) there is still nothing like getting your paws on the real thing.

Some initial impressions:

Lighter than I thought for some reason.

I'm not ecstatic about the physical feel of the B&C stock on the Excalibur, but I'll probably get used to it. It fits me just fine, perfectly functional, and the red spider web is kinda cool, but it feels different. I put a leather shell holder on the buttstock, so it doesn't feel weird on my face.

The bolt is smooth as glass - the spiral fluting is cool!

Gap between the barrel and the stock is perfectly even all around. As it should be.

I put a 3x9 rimfire scope on, just to see how it felt scoped. It's true what they say... After handling it for even just a few minutes, all my other hunting rifles started to feel awkward and unbalanced somehow. Hard to explain but other Cooper owners probably know what I mean.

It's probably also true.... you can't just have one. I'll likely have another down the road, in a wood stock....
 
I agree with most of your observations. My only gripes with the Excalibur are that the wrist on the stock is a bit thick and the safety bugs me, but these are minor things and only my personal preferences which I can overlook.
After having and handling true lightweights like Montana's, Custom M7's and a NULA, the Excalibur hardly feels light to me though. That said, I don't mind the extra heft at times, it makes it a lot easier to shoot than a super light.
 
I have one ordered but it will be awhile before it arrives. Clay sent me a Jackson Hunter to handle. I wasn't that found of the safety also. I found the stock to barrel gap a bit on the large side, however it was even. The action was incredibly smooth and overall the rifle handle nicely. Having relatively short arms I found the LOP a bit long and ordered 13.5" as opposed to the standard 13.75". Obviously I liked it or I wouldn't have ordered one.
Let us know how it shoots?
 
Last edited:
they are very nice and shoot well too. i like the mag setup it looks more like a floorplate and i like the flat metal finish too.i don't like the stock. it could be trimmer. i'm thinking more like a mcmillan win featherweight stock pattern or a rem mountain rifle pattern stock. problem is it adds $500 to an already expensive rifle.
 
Just over 6.5 lbs for short action(22" bbl) and 7.75 lbs for long action(24"bbl).

So not as light as Popcan was saying in the other thread... Kinda what I thought but I don't have any hands on with the Excalibur.

? How light is "lightweight" to you? The Excalibur is as light as my Sako A-7, which is just over 6 lbs scoped....
 
So not as light as Popcan was saying in the other thread... Kinda what I thought but I don't have any hands on with the Excalibur.


You're right... it's deceiving I think because it is better balanced, so it seems lighter.

(plus, I didn't have a scope on it yet either).

Still, it's a LOT lighter than my other .308, which is an M40 A-1 clone at something like 14lbs lol!
 
A nice balancing rifle can certainly make a difference.

Yup, and I think there's such a thing as too light. The short action Kimber Montana's are right on the verge of too light. I owned a RMR Alpine Extreme in 308 at one time that weighed right around 4.5 lbs. I couldn't hit the broad side of a barn offhand and it kicked worse than my 375. :D
 
The short action Kimber Montana's are right on the verge of too light.

They most certainly take some getting used to, more than other light rifles I have owned. Now that I have the Roberts figured out it will do MOA (usually a bit better) out to 300 yards from the bench. I haven't had a chance to shoot it further, yet. I am finding it easier to shoot from field positions than off the bench though.
 
Back
Top Bottom