Thats strange...even the american websites i have visited and other little references i've seen say its a P17.
Thats strange...even the american websites i have visited and other little references i've seen say its a P17.
In 30.06 it is a P17, the same design as the P14. The original design was in .303 British because it was designed by the British to replace the SMLE as the Army's service rifle. (They wanted something Mauser-like because they thought their poor showing in the Boer War was due to the Boers being typically armed with Mausers.) WWI caused them to increase production of SMLEs as much as possible in Royal Ordnance factories and let contracts to make more to commercial factories in Britain to equip the huge conscript army. They let contracts to U.S. firms to start making the new P14, but the SMLE did so well in the unanticipated trench conditions of WWI they decided to avoid the challenges of changing their service rifle in the middle of a rather large war. Some use was made of the P14s but they never became the common arm of the frontline troops.
When the U.S.A. entered the war they knew they needed to grow a very much bigger army very quickly, and it was found that their arsenals could not produce their service rifle, the 1903 Springfield, in the necessary quantities in timely fashion. It was also soon realised that with very little re-tooling the P14 factories could make the P14 in the U.S. standard calibre, 30.06 and in sufficient quantities to equip the newly-raised troops. So the British sold their P14 set-up to the U.S.A. at a bargain price, and the American version in 30.06 was designated P17 (it was 1917) and issued to most of their expeditionary force in Europe.
why over any other Enfield, hakx? I will definitely take a look at this rifle...you guys have REALLY perked my interest and curiousity now. on the other hand...I've always wanted an Enfield No.4 Mk.II...mostly because I love their look and because from everything I've read, the Mk.II is somewhat superior to the Mk.I...tho I will bet there are legions who naysay the I vs. the II! LOL!Just can never go wrong with a p17 - especially for $100!!
I would happily take on of them over any other Enfield.
why over any other Enfield, hakx? I will definitely take a look at this rifle...you guys have REALLY perked my interest and curiousity now. on the other hand...I've always wanted an Enfield No.4 Mk.II...mostly because I love their look and because from everything I've read, the Mk.II is somewhat superior to the Mk.I...tho I will bet there are legions who naysay the I vs. the II! LOL!
why over any other Enfield, hakx? I will definitely take a look at this rifle...you guys have REALLY perked my interest and curiousity now. on the other hand...I've always wanted an Enfield No.4 Mk.II...mostly because I love their look and because from everything I've read, the Mk.II is somewhat superior to the Mk.I...tho I will bet there are legions who naysay the I vs. the II! LOL!
And, I believe, the original rifle was the pattern 1913, to be in a rimless 7mm-ish cartridge, to replace the SMLE. WWI broke out, and the Pattern 1914 was an emergency decision to be made in .303, so that existing ammunition could be used.
I will happily be corrected, if in error.
Cheers,
Neal
No3 Mk1??? WTF is a No3 Mk1......![]()



























