You need a TAC SAC
Guy on the EE had a pink kriss vector with these on it. Tactical sack
To much #### on my AR15?
- Thread starter CanadianBaconPancakes
- Start date
Guy on the EE had a pink kriss vector with these on it. Tactical sack
Ar180shooter
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Ottawa, ON
Not excessive but my preference for a carbine is either a red dot/holographic sight or a low power variable (1-4, 1-6, etc) optic. Maybe a flashlight. A higher power (3-9, 4-12) scope with a red dot on top is too bulky and not really that useful for a rifle that you're likely not going to shoot beyond 300 yards.
It's only #### if you don't need/use it. For some that would be the trigger.
Tac-Sac must be one of those club "secret codes" I've heard about. Next up a ##### shaped pistol grip for the operators out there. How about a ##### shaped butt-stock you clamp in your teeth. Oh yeah now we're talkin.
Tac-Sac must be one of those club "secret codes" I've heard about. Next up a ##### shaped pistol grip for the operators out there. How about a ##### shaped butt-stock you clamp in your teeth. Oh yeah now we're talkin.
Last edited:
Needs more rails
In all seriousness though what you have is already pretty minimal i think. The only issue is you have two optics that, while covering different ends of the spectrum of tasks, don't really compliment each other functionally and even can be kind of a hindrance to each other. For example, you clearly don't have a precision rifle there, but with that massive honking scope it's not going to be particularly handy at short distances either. Also, if i may make this assumption, i take it you have to take your face way off the stock to actually see the dot.
You could've saved a lot of weight just using a mid range variable scope and forgo the red dot. And if you really felt the need for one you could ditch the massive tube style red dot and replace it with a micro open style red dot.
In all seriousness though what you have is already pretty minimal i think. The only issue is you have two optics that, while covering different ends of the spectrum of tasks, don't really compliment each other functionally and even can be kind of a hindrance to each other. For example, you clearly don't have a precision rifle there, but with that massive honking scope it's not going to be particularly handy at short distances either. Also, if i may make this assumption, i take it you have to take your face way off the stock to actually see the dot.
You could've saved a lot of weight just using a mid range variable scope and forgo the red dot. And if you really felt the need for one you could ditch the massive tube style red dot and replace it with a micro open style red dot.
Last edited:
I prefer the french press butstock.
Mumbles Marble Mouth
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Lower Mainland
Too much for me. I prefer nothing more than a micro red dot and that's it.
Still alive
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Rainy mosquito infested part of BC
The only thing I must have on my ARs is a good trigger, BUIS, a RDS, Raptor charging handle, a WML, QD points for a sling and Magpul pistol grip and buttstock.
AFGs, stubbies, BAD lever, ambi safeties, muzzle brakes and fancy BCGs are nice but not really necessary.
AFGs, stubbies, BAD lever, ambi safeties, muzzle brakes and fancy BCGs are nice but not really necessary.
No sense in having anything more than 4x on a gun that is likely only good for 2.5 moa
You would be surprised how well you can group with only 4x zoom... I sure was anyways
If you are going to shoot 75gr thru a good barrel and dial every shot then its worth using a 10 power scope
You would be surprised how well you can group with only 4x zoom... I sure was anyways
If you are going to shoot 75gr thru a good barrel and dial every shot then its worth using a 10 power scope
