...............that is my question.
I have a Bushnell TRS-25 red dot sight that I took off a firearm that is now, shall we say, useless.
Last week I installed that sight on a new O/U shotgun that has a green fiber-optic front sight and a notched picatinny rail in the rear, whose notch either serves as a rough rear sight or as a mount for an optical sight such as the red dot.
Mounting the red dot and having it bore-sighted with a laser seemed like a no-brainer thing to do at the time, but now I'm not so sure. I think I may have been swayed by either using the red dot or having it, like the firearm on which it was originally installed on, become useless, sitting on a shelf. (But, unlike the firearm, I suppose I could sell the red dot.)
Anyway, I also installed a flashlight on the left front picatinny rail, so the target will be well-illuminated even at night for either aiming method.
This shotgun is only going to be fired on targets that are, shall we say, close range -- probably 8 yards, maximum.
Unlike the stock sights, the red dot has to be switched on, and there is also some brief, head-bobbing, "finding the red dot" that takes place before putting the dot on the target (aiming) can occur. Doing both of these takes some time, albeit a small amount.
In short, I think that target-acquistion/aiming might be overall easier and faster without the red dot, but I'd like to hear some other opinions -- particularly from bird and clay shooters (but maybe this is the wrong forum to hear from that particular group).
Thanks.
I have a Bushnell TRS-25 red dot sight that I took off a firearm that is now, shall we say, useless.
Last week I installed that sight on a new O/U shotgun that has a green fiber-optic front sight and a notched picatinny rail in the rear, whose notch either serves as a rough rear sight or as a mount for an optical sight such as the red dot.
Mounting the red dot and having it bore-sighted with a laser seemed like a no-brainer thing to do at the time, but now I'm not so sure. I think I may have been swayed by either using the red dot or having it, like the firearm on which it was originally installed on, become useless, sitting on a shelf. (But, unlike the firearm, I suppose I could sell the red dot.)
Anyway, I also installed a flashlight on the left front picatinny rail, so the target will be well-illuminated even at night for either aiming method.
This shotgun is only going to be fired on targets that are, shall we say, close range -- probably 8 yards, maximum.
Unlike the stock sights, the red dot has to be switched on, and there is also some brief, head-bobbing, "finding the red dot" that takes place before putting the dot on the target (aiming) can occur. Doing both of these takes some time, albeit a small amount.
In short, I think that target-acquistion/aiming might be overall easier and faster without the red dot, but I'd like to hear some other opinions -- particularly from bird and clay shooters (but maybe this is the wrong forum to hear from that particular group).
Thanks.





























), this morning I removed both the TRS-25 AND the picatinny rail. 





















