Seriously? You put your $1800 gun in worse conditions then submerged in sand, silt and water? 'Arguably' is probably the correct adverb
The range I shoot at has a VERY dirty/dusty pistol bay, and shooting a carbine from various prone positions basically ensures that every orifice available on the gun gets packed with crap. Between doing that plus running 4-500 rounds through it while in that condition, and the fact that all this dude was lay his gun down in a container of sand, i'll use the word "arguably"
If you'd like, I can show you pictures of the wear and tear that my 229 Legion suffered last weekend, and you can be the judge. Hopefully i'm not talking out of my ass on this one, but I really did give it a tough couple days for its first test.
I will repeat that I am surprised by the results. I know nothing of this Rex gun, but I've shot a 226 or 229 a hell of a lot over the last year or so, and I think I've literally had one unintentional double feed in thousands of rounds through either. I agree with whoever said that a sample size of 1 isn't indicative of overall quality.


















































