TRG is going to get a bit lonelly at it's price range. As well as A7 rought tech and

owlowl said:
Not to make fun of it, but honestly invoking that "go to war" argument is a bit out of place here. It is not even PGW coyote. And none of us here is going to die under hostile fire holding their beloved TRG.

P.
Click to expand...
.
So a rifle that can shoot a wide range of ammo incredibly consistently has no value to real world users? The op was commenting on the value of the two. TRG's are great rifles and worth the cost to some of us who have tested them extensively for real world use. Your comment was rather childish
 
dizzy said:
.
So a rifle that can shoot a wide range of ammo incredibly consistently has no value to real world users? The op was commenting on the value of the two. TRG's are great rifles and worth the cost to some of us who have tested them extensively for real world use. Your comment was rather childish
Click to expand...

owlowl is the OP.

A huge firm like Sako/Tikka (part of the Beretta Group) knows what they are doing. Releasing a cheaper rifle does not mean nobody is going to buy the TRG, otherwise they would simply discontinue it if there's no demand.

To a lot of people Ferraris are not worth it, and yet people still buy them.
 
Jeezzzuzz guys....

What's with all this go to war fantasy crap?

I'm willing to bet not one guy on this thread is active military and the most action any of us will ever see with our TRGs will be in either F Class competition or PRS.

As civilians, our lives are not "on the line" here.

We all luv our tacticool guns but that's all they are.... and its just for fun.
 
you are correct guys, the trg is overpriced for many on these boards, and its useful features are of little no use to range shooters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom