While a CC chargeback is ultimately likely to win, it's the wrong tactic at this point. Let TNA deal with it. It's their reponsibility, and from all accounts they appear to be a quality supplier. No need to burn bridges on something like this.
Well as someone that worked for a bank for 12 years I can tell you that you are not correct. If the company fraudulently took your money and did not send anything then yes. If they can prove the item was shipped then you may be SOL ( for instance a waybill number receipt for shipping showing your address etc) The culprit here is Canada Post. If the company did it's job it's not at fault here. Some credit cards will carry insurance ( such as RBC Visa's) that will allow you to make a claim for the lost items but it has nothing to do with the company and you will be limited to how many times you can make a claim. If they sent you a tracking number it's pretty clear they shipped it. Likely the claim needs to be made by TNA as they were the customer but you should try Canada Post as well.
There have even be a few incidents where the Canada Post drives parks out front and runs up to the house to drop off a missed delivery slip, but never knocks on the door or brings the parcel up. Lazy ####s.
In this situation we open a service ticket with Canada post and usually this causes the parcel to be delivered. Parcels only get truly lost and gone in about ~1 out of 800 shipments.
In this case the parcel was declared lost so we are going to replace the items or refund. The customer has been contacted.
I think you went above and beyond in my opinion TNA. Canada Post offers insurance to be purchased on a parcel and if the customer is unwilling to purchase it, at who's risk should that be? I send packages out all the time and ask if the buyer wants to purchase insurance. I send in good faith with tracking and once it's in Canada Post's hands, how can I possibly be held responsible for it's fate at that stage? Sorry, buyer's risk in my opinion. Entitleists...take responsibility for your decisions.
You have to remember what the implied contract is. He pays money to receive his item(s). He didn't receive his item(s). The contract is unfulfilled. Whether you like it or not, common law rules. TNA realizes this.
Don't think it's that simple with online orders. The seller shipped the item as agreed upon with proof of tracking, thus his end of the contract is fulfilled. Any other expectation is beyond a reasonable amount of control the seller has. A third party carrier has responsibilities of their own to deliver the parcel, that's another story. Most of the time business accounts negotiated with Canada Post include insurance automatically on packages and stores file a claim when a package is declared lost or damaged. I believe that's what we're seeing here.
Think about it another way - you sell something on the EE and the buyer declines insurance. You carefully wrap it up and send their item with tracking and CP declares it lost. Are YOU the one that should be responsible for cost the item?
So should I take action regarding my order or just say screw it, close enough?
Hi Maxman
I wouldn't be satisfied if it were me. I'm sorry to read this is how your order was handled.
Today I will talk to my staff and see how soon we can get a restock of the correct barrel you ordered.
Also I will talk my other staff on how to better handle this type of out of stock situation next time.
(Zach here)