Recently read an article in Jan./Feb. Rifle Shooter magazine regarding the calculation of optimal twist rate.
Here is the formula:
Bullet Length divided by its diameter = X
150(constant) divided by X times diameter(caliber)
Example
.257 Roberts 120 gr spitzer
1.125/.257=4.38
150/4.38=34.25x.257=8.8
So a good twist rate for this rifle rounding up would be 9", which is the normally accepted twist rate.
Now my .204
32gr V-max
.635/.204=3.11
150/3.11=48.23x.204=9.84
So the recommended twist rate rounding up would be 10", but, my SPS 700 Varmint has a 12" twist, so theoretically an even a lighter/smaller bullet would be optimal.
Am I missing something or why would a manufacturer produce a twist rate that factory bullets aren't even manufactured for. My rifle shoots excellent, just crunching the numbers to educate myself a little. Is there some deal at the lighter end of the bullet spectrum that invalidates this formula?
Here is the formula:
Bullet Length divided by its diameter = X
150(constant) divided by X times diameter(caliber)
Example
.257 Roberts 120 gr spitzer
1.125/.257=4.38
150/4.38=34.25x.257=8.8
So a good twist rate for this rifle rounding up would be 9", which is the normally accepted twist rate.
Now my .204
32gr V-max
.635/.204=3.11
150/3.11=48.23x.204=9.84
So the recommended twist rate rounding up would be 10", but, my SPS 700 Varmint has a 12" twist, so theoretically an even a lighter/smaller bullet would be optimal.
Am I missing something or why would a manufacturer produce a twist rate that factory bullets aren't even manufactured for. My rifle shoots excellent, just crunching the numbers to educate myself a little. Is there some deal at the lighter end of the bullet spectrum that invalidates this formula?
Last edited: