Ultimate Hunting Gun {Smith & Wesson Performance Center 500}

John Y Cannuck

RichPoorMan<br>Super Moderator
Moderating Team
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Ultimate Hunting Gun
wessongun.jpg

By John B. Snow

The Smith & Wesson Performance Center 500 is the ultimate hunting gun.

November 2006

Is the world’s most versatile hunting firearm a handgun? Could be. The Smith & Wesson Performance Center 500 can handle every huntable animal you might encounter. It shoots loads light enough for varmints, heavy enough for thick-skinned dangerous game and flat enough for long-distance species such as sheep or antelope.

A. Compensator Its 360-degree design throws flame like the exhaust from a Top Fuel dragster but it helps tame the .500’s formidable recoil, making 275- and 325-grain loads kick less than a .44 Mag. It also acts as a barrel nut, suspending the barrel in the barrel shroud. In essence, it pulls the barrel between the frame and compensator, eliminating barrel stress and enhancing the revolver’s accuracy.

B. Barrel Smith & Wesson’s Performance Center offers the 500 in three barrel lengths (6½ inches, 7½ inches and 10½ inches). The 10½-inch barrel pictured here gives the best performance with the various loads for the 500, both in terms of velocity and accuracy. All Performance Center 500 barrels are made by Lothar-Walther and are precision ground at both the crown and the forcing cone, where the barrel extends through the frame. What you actually see is the barrel shroud. The barrel itself is contained within it, suspended between the frame and compensator.

C. Scope Traditionally, hunting handguns have been effective to about 100 yards or so (the exception being some single-shot handguns chambered for rifle cartridges). However, with the downrange energy and trajectory of the 500, the only limit is your shooting ability. Leupold’s VX-III 2.5–8x32 extended-eye-relief scope lets you reach out there as far as your skills will allow. With a proper rest (see below) and shooting technique, handgunning out to 200 yards is no longer out of the question. ($470; 800-237-4444; cabelas.com)

D. Rings Not just any scope ring will withstand the punishing recoil generated by the 500’s heaviest loads. These cross-slot-style rings from Leupold—the company’s PRWs to be exact—offer the best grip because they have metal tabs that sit in the integral grooves machined into the top of the revolver’s barrel shroud. This integral Picatinny-style rail—available only on the 10½-inch model—eliminates the need for a separate scope base, which is another accuracy-enhancing feature of this revolver.

E. Chin The chin in front of the trigger guard is the best spot to rest a handgun when you’re using shooting sticks or any other shooting aid. Placing the barrel (or the barrel shroud, in the case of the Performance Center 500) of any handgun on a rest can introduce accuracy-destroying stress, especially when you’re shooting at longer distances.

F. Cylinder With its five charging holes, the 500 gives you better backup capability than most rifles. And with the exception of a double rifle, a revolver gives you the quickest follow-up shots of any repeater in the event of a misfire, a comforting advantage when you’re hunting dangerous game.

G. Trigger Crisp as a mountain trout stream, the trigger is tuned to break at 4 pounds in single-action mode. The Performance Center hammer and trigger components are forged, not metal-injected, which allows them to be matched up for a crisper let-off and better trigger pull.

H. Grip Smartly designed grips by Hogue feature a gel insert where the web of your hand rests to help dampen the 500’s kick. Made of a material called Sorbothane, the insert acts just like a recoil pad on a shotgun or rifle.

$ Price Custom guns never come cheap, but given that the Performance Center 500 is built by hand by master craftsmen and will put every bullet right where you point it, the $1,391 price tag doesn’t seem quite so unreasonable. (800-331-0852; smith-wesson.com)

Cor-Bon 325 gr. Barnes XPB Muzzle velocity/energy 1,800 fps/2,338 ft.-lb. Best for Long-range handgunning details Sighted-in 3.1 inches high at 100 yards, this spitzer-style bullet drops only 7.7 inches at 200 yards.

Hornady 350 gr. XTP Mag
Muzzle velocity/energy 1,900 fps/2,805 ft.-lb. Best for Deer details With .30/06-class muzzle energy, this bullet will knock any whitetail sideways. Has proven effective on bear and larger game, too.

Winchester 400 gr. Platinum
Muzzle velocity/energy 1,800 fps/2,877 ft.-lb. Best for Large game details This bullet has the heft and construction to tackle elk, bear, caribou and other large-bodied game animals. Works well for deer, too.

Hornady 500 gr. XTP FP
Muzzle velocity/energy 1,425 fps/2,254 ft.-lb. Best for Heavy and dangerous game details When your goal is deep penetration and a large, leaky hole, this flat-nosed sledgehammer will do the trick.

Take a Rest
The Explorer Monopod from Stoney Point telescopes from 25 to 62 inches, so you can shoot from a sitting, kneeling or standing position. Don’t be tempted to grip the monopod when shooting a revolver unless you enjoy getting burned by the cylinder flash. Use a two-handed grip instead. ($41; 507-354-3360; stoneypoint.com)

Sling It
Light isn’t one of the words to describe the 500. This sling from Uncle Mike’s, included with the gun, was inspired by the straps golfers use on their club bags and makes lugging the 500’s 82 ounces around much easier. The strip down the middle of the cushioned pad grips clothing to minimize slippage.
 
Last edited:
See - THAT is what i was talking about before. You show someone that gun in the picture, and there is no arguing that gun was BUILT to hunt. With performance figures like they're talking it's very hard to argue that this gun is not your 'average handgun' and is obviously quite capable of taking game.

You take someone who's used to seeing 'standard' handguns at the range, and you show them this and it's performance capabilities, and you are pretty much eliminating the argument that handguns may not have the power to hunt game cleanly.

I mean - 2800 ftlbs of energy at the barrel? With a 50 cal projectile? Yikes! That's going to hit hard and ANYONE can see that. Yet it's at least 2/3'rds more compact and easy to carry - and while it might be heavy for a handgun, it's light for a rifle.

It takes 50 percent of the argument against handguns right out of the picture.
 
Interesting to note as well - they felt it was worth mentioning that the longer barrel gave more in both accuracy and energy :) Told ya that was something that was 'marketable'.
 
Foxer said:
Interesting to note as well - they felt it was worth mentioning that the longer barrel gave more in both accuracy and energy :) Told ya that was something that was 'marketable'.
Marketing is right, it would likely have similar performance with a shorter barrel.
However, the big gun is likely steady as a rock on a rest, or even from a kneeling position.

Even guns such as the BFR in 45-70 would be good albiet shorter range hunters.

I won't give up on my old classics in 45 colt or 44 mag though. Within their range they are deadly.
 
That was the plan with the article, and there are a goodly number of similar handguns on the market.

Now - just as a disclaimer for those out there who seem to take every single thing that isn't absolutely pro-snub-nose-pistol as being anti gun - i'm not saying that the following is the only way to do things, BUT:

If you can imagine that the first 'handgun hunting' laws only allowed for guns that had those kinds of performance or characteristics, you can see how that would make it about two to three times easier to 'sell' the argument.

Police are concerned about 'concealability' of guns in the woods - stuff one of those bad boys down your pants and walk around for a bit. They'll see that gun as fast and easy as they see a rifle. You won't be able to toss that 10 inch one in a glove box when you see a warden and claim you weren't hunting or hide the fact it was loaded very easily.

Anyone worried about 'sufficient power' would simply be told 'do you think 30-06's are enough? Same energy, bigger bullet. Shaddap!'.

The gun is obviously built around being accurate. And by that i don't just mean the barrel accuracy, but the design helps the shooter be more accurate meaning it probably takes less time in practice to get good enough for 100 yard ranges with a little room for error. (which are practical hunting ranges)

Contenders also obviously fall into that 'class'.

The effect on the argument would be overwhelming. It would just leave the question 'how hard are they to shoot' and that is easily addressed. Something like that we could push thru with about half the effort of 'any handgun'.
 
Marketing is right, it would likely have similar performance with a shorter barrel.

When it comes to handguns and the general hunter/public, it's all about perception baby. :) Perception is the biggest problem we face.
 
Well, with the registry fight, the truth is winning. With a goodly dose of Liberal lies and coruption.

Well that's just it. Different fight, due in large part to the fact that the liberal lies are becoming IMPOSSIBLE to deny for many people, and the consequences of their lies are seen virtually every day in the papers.

Handgun hunting is different. For the most part, the people we have to convince aren't being fed a lot of lies, they're being fed a lot of misconceptions and have concerns based largely on lack of knowledge. The problem is, they have no real desire to spend any amount of time to become knowledgeable. So you have to demonstrate 'good will' in other ways.

hey - lets get real, at 100-150 yards (where something like 90 percent of game is shot) there is zero difference in 'lethality' between a 30-06 and a 300 winmag - both are going to kill an animal stone dead with a shot to the vitals. Yet somehow, the idea has been propagated (mostly thur marketing efforts) that somehow the 300 will kill the deer "deader".

It's like that movie spinal tap... "this is my favorite amp, it goes to 'eleven'" "Oh? Is it more powerful than the other amps, is it better or more clear sounding"" - "I TOLD you - the dial goes to eleven! The others just go to ten. Eleven must be better".

The picture above is a picture of a gun that 'goes to eleven'. :) Because every inch of it is 'designed to hunt' and 'maximize killing power', the perception is it's more than capable of doing the job.

Even if you had a 5 inch revolver with open sights that looked like a 'regular cowboy revolver' but somehow shot just as well and powerful as that gun - people would think it was 'iffy'. It's the way people are. So you gotta address it.
 
Thank you both (Foxer and John Y Canuck) for keeping this one on track and civil.
Foxer, your comments on public perception are very true. Good call.
I think that we, as hunters/shooters should put forward a proposal to the various Provincial wildlife branches, with a minimum Foot/Pound rating for HGH
 
I've got the 6.5 barrel version (as in my avitar) and I'm doing what I can to be able to hunt with it.

** I changed my avatar a while back ... it used to be the 500 S&W that you see in my post on the next page of this thread. **
 
Last edited:
Foxer said:
hey - lets get real, at 100-150 yards (where something like 90 percent of game is shot) there is zero difference in 'lethality' between a 30-06 and a 300 winmag - both are going to kill an animal stone dead with a shot to the vitals. Yet somehow, the idea has been propagated (mostly thur marketing efforts) that somehow the 300 will kill the deer "deader".

Actually, it's hard to *prove* but i think that 300's are where the "killing power" jumps up a notch over the 270/30-06/7RM

Just personal experience and that of several other hunters. basiclaly the larger bullet is movign faster, making the kills more dramatic, shot placement being the same...But that is a different thread.;)

It's like that movie spinal tap... "this is my favorite amp, it goes to 'eleven'" "Oh? Is it more powerful than the other amps, is it better or more clear sounding"" - "I TOLD you - the dial goes to eleven! The others just go to ten. Eleven must be better".

Actually, the guy says "well, why not make *10* a higher volume then? and the guitar plaer says "yeah, but this goes to eleven." I was just thinking about that movie and that scene today, ironically.:cool:

Even if you had a 5 inch revolver with open sights that looked like a 'regular cowboy revolver' but somehow shot just as well and powerful as that gun - people would think it was 'iffy'

Although the truth is- A experienced guy wiht a 5" cowboy gun with a less powerful cartridge woudl kill more game, more effectively, than the novice withthe ELEVEN gun...Just like grandpa wiht his 30-30 will kill more game than his grandson wiht his 300RUM HB with 6-24 scope.:D

Too bad that the tactics has to revolve around decieving people.
 
Actually, it's hard to *prove* but i think that 300's are where the "killing power" jumps up a notch over the 270/30-06/7RM

Dramatic perhaps, but either one in the boiler room at 100 yards means dead deer guaranteed :D

I guess my point is that despite the fact both have the same ability to kill and kill cleanly, but one is percieved to be significantly more 'lethal' than the other. Heck even the 7mm mag... some people still think it is WAY more lethal than the 30-06. But light into a deer at 100 yards with one of each, and i suspect you'd have to look REAAL hard to see the difference, especially with todays modern powders and premium bullets (p-17 says he's getting damn near 3000 fps out of his 30-06 with one of the new vitovori powders using 168 grain tripleshocks)

Actually, the guy says "well, why not make *10* a higher volume then? and the guitar plaer says "yeah, but this goes to eleven." I was just thinking about that movie and that scene today, ironically

Heh. Been a while since i saw it - but you know what i mean right?

Although the truth is- A experienced guy wiht a 5" cowboy gun with a less powerful cartridge woudl kill more game, more effectively, than the novice withthe ELEVEN gun...Just like grandpa wiht his 30-30 will kill more game than his grandson wiht his 300RUM HB with 6-24 scope.

Too bad that the tactics has to revolve around decieving people.

Well it's not necessarily deceiving people. That gun claims it's easier to shoot with the brake on it than a 44. And many people have commented longer barrels are easier to be accurate with. So, while i appreciate what you're saying in that monster magnums that hurt to shoot will cause bad shooting habits, again we come back to 'purpose designed' hunting guns are plenty effective, BUT also are seen to be so. The encore/contenders would be another example - It would be VERY hard for grampa to argue that a 30-30 round coming out of a 15 inch barrel pistol is not perfectly lethal on deer out past 100 yards and change.

All you're left with after that is the concern that its too hard to be proficient with handguns. And once you narrow the argument down to a few points like that, it gets pretty easy to beat one way or another.
 
Foxer said:
If you can imagine that the first 'handgun hunting' laws only allowed for guns that had those kinds of performance or characteristics, you can see how that would make it about two to three times easier to 'sell' the argument.


This is a very good idea. If it is clearly made for hunting...maybe they'll have less of a problem with it. One step at a time
 
Back
Top Bottom