Good points made in this thread. A new-to-the-game gunner will decide for him or herself whether or not they want the rifle the way it is. It is good to have discussions like this one. A lot of gun people, new and old, simply aren't aware of the many facets of buying and collecting military surplus rifles. We each give our opinion and experience and it is out there for the others to digest.
When I started buying military rifles many moons ago, I had little idea of what to watch for. In the olden days, as my young daughter once called them, we only had books to go by. I was the only guy in my area that I was aware of who was buying "them old army rifles". Now, just key in a question and - PRESTO!! - 15 answers. Great stuff. Not only has gathering info and experience changed. Collecting has, too. We have all likely noticed that, for example, they quit making No. 5's about the year I was born. Some were lost to use and abuse, some went to Bubba, and as a result very few pop up for sale.
No collector value? With so few available at a given time, it would sell in a heartbeat. Maybe it wouldn't interest a real picky collector. So be it.
Try another example here. How about a scruffy old Finn capture M91, somewhat beat up? Jumping Jeehosephant!

It has a SAT barrel! A couple or three years ago I posted a pic of the receiver on another milsurp site and my poor old computer nearly went up in smoke.
I ended up with two Belgian Congo 1894 Winchesters, neither of which was a "perfect" example. One guy bought them both!!
I enjoy all of my old beaters, good, bad, and ugly. Do your due diligence, make your decision, and enjoy!!
