sillymike
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I concur.
The group of guys my camp is made up of have killed scads of deer and moose over the years with sub $200 scopes.
In fact just this summer I bought a used "package" scope for $25 and put it on a 10/22. Theres zero, I repeat ZERO problems with plinking with it. Would I put it on a deer rifle? No. Do I care if it wont allow me to shoot a squirrel one day or not hit a popcan at 100m iat dusk? Not at all.
Shooting is about having fun, something the gear snobs seem to have forgotten.
I guess we all have our tolerance to "gambling" and put different value on our time.
- To me, hunting and time and range time are pretty valuable.
While I'm sure there are plenty of individuals who have had decent luck with "value" scope...
- I've known a bunch who had cheaper tasco/vortex/Barska/Leaper failed.
To me, having a range trip/hunt scrapped because of failed optic doesn't make financial sens.
- Given the option of a plain-jane 4x duplex Leupold, of some fancy variable-illuminated reticle promo-scope, I'll pick the boring 4x.