herpinator45
Regular
- Location
- Southern Ontario - Just off 401
So who here is familiar with vibratory screeners?
Here is my issue;
in an attempt to seperate 223 from ceramic cone media I had a couple of screens made. In theory they would work well, in reality not so much.
It seems I am getting about 70% of the brass in the top bucket with about 30% of the cone media in the top bucket also.
Bottom bucket is running about 70% media and 30% brass.
The head size of 223 and the cone media are essentially identical. I have though about going to a slightly smaller screen with a hole around 7/16" of an inch vs the 1/2" I am running now, try and have a lower density of holes.
I have reduced the amplitude of the vibration to try and prevent the 223 from dropping through the screen. This did increase the efficiency, however not near efficient enough.
I just want to see if anyone is familiar with this type of equipment before I drop another $100 on a screen.
here are the photos.




Here is my issue;
in an attempt to seperate 223 from ceramic cone media I had a couple of screens made. In theory they would work well, in reality not so much.
It seems I am getting about 70% of the brass in the top bucket with about 30% of the cone media in the top bucket also.
Bottom bucket is running about 70% media and 30% brass.
The head size of 223 and the cone media are essentially identical. I have though about going to a slightly smaller screen with a hole around 7/16" of an inch vs the 1/2" I am running now, try and have a lower density of holes.
I have reduced the amplitude of the vibration to try and prevent the 223 from dropping through the screen. This did increase the efficiency, however not near efficient enough.
I just want to see if anyone is familiar with this type of equipment before I drop another $100 on a screen.
here are the photos.
Attachments
Last edited:


















































