so.... JNA.. we are still ok with the cz-858 ?!
I am in no way affiliated with Marstar, just bug him for answers on the chrome lined vz-58. However as a Gun Nut I think we are still OK with the 858, but I really wanted a chrome lined version
so.... JNA.. we are still ok with the cz-858 ?!
I got some news regarding the reclassification of the VZ58 (this is from an insider in the industry):
Apparently the reclassification only affects the CZ 858, and not the CSA VZ58. The person I spoke to was very very certain of this. This is affirmed in the following areas:
1. This document mentions "CZ858" explicitly: http://static.globalnews.ca/content/interactives/documents/general_news_bucket/A-2012-00068.PDF
2. The CZ858 can no longer be found anywhere in Canada (this has been my experience, and doing Google searches comes up empty on any sources of this rifle), but the CSA VZ 58 continues to be plentiful. In fact I have one currently on order. Wolverine Supplies (explicitly mentioned in the document above) is the distributor of the CZ 858 rifle and they have not had stock for months now, whereas I know for a fact that the CSA VZ 58 rifle shipments have been coming in during that time.
ps. the chrome lined CSA VZ 58 Non restricted are in the country.
Most recent reply from John:
Due to the current rulings we will not be importing these....
No difference really between the cz and the vz so why would they pick on one and not the other.
If they take one they will take them all. Just one at a time.
No difference really between the cz and the vz so why would they pick on one and not the other.
If they take one they will take them all. Just one at a time.
Don't the vz.58s have chrome lined barrels?
I have seen non-restricted CSA vz.58s for sale online, literally only one site though, for whatever reason everybody else is stocking the restricted ones.Yes but only the restricted versions...but as superlative announced, the chrome-lined non-restricted version are apparently in the country.
What's the difference they are all heading to the prohib pile![]()
Oh, that is not the case.
The VZ is entirely new production, while the CZ is built using some surplus parts. Then, there is the tab, the finish, etc...
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Around 2009/2010(time of the now infamous report) - Didn't Marstar have some VZ58(L?)s classed as prohibited because they were made from surplus parts (i.e. converted FAs? - or some such thing)...
...And at that time it was said the cz858s/czh2003 models were NOT affected because they were built as "newly manufactured" using "semi-only" parts?
What's the difference they are all heading to the prohib pile![]()
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Around 2009/2010(time of the now infamous report) - Didn't Marstar have some VZ58(L?)s classed as prohibited because they were made from surplus parts (i.e. converted FAs? - or some such thing)...
...And at that time it was said the cz858s/czh2003 models were NOT affected because they were built as "newly manufactured" using "semi-only" parts?
That's what I heard too. The issue is not about functionality, since the CZ858 and VZ58 are functionally identical. The issue is a technicality BS that because the RECEIVER is possibly a converted FA (not sure whether it is, but apparently this is the RCMP's concern), then that makes the CZ858 a "bad gun". Since the CSA VZ58 was constructed as semi only, then it's okay. The CSA VZ58 safety switch switches in the opposite direction to the CZ858, and maybe that affirms that the receiver designs are different.