Vz58 or su 16 fx

[SteveSanderson]

Which is the better gun?
Thanks
Steve

 

[saskcop]

Better for what?

 

[Innavedaw]

I prefer the VZ..better would be dependent on your criteria.

 

[Ebola]

Vz is much better.

 

[TV-PressPass]

I like the Vz58 for it's metal communist funtimes. I'm assuming you're thinking .223 here though?

 

[DT741]

VZ

get it in 7.62x39 for more fun

 

[Redblack]

I would not buy a plastic kel tec

 

[Phat Eagle]

VZ

get it in 7.62x39 for more fun

And more reliability. The SU16 looks fine, but the two I've handled were plasticky P.O.S. and couldn't hold zero to save your life. I would go with the VZ HANDS DOWN.

 

[SteveSanderson]

Thanks guys and yes I want in 223
Steve

 

[*MALICE*]

The VZ in every category except 'breakability'

 

[Deckard]

The SU 16 made out of aluminum would be awesome.

 

[jrcarbine]

Su-16's are pretty cool. I think kel-tech worked out the issues and now the new ones are better.

 

[*MALICE*]

The SU 16 made out of aluminum would be awesome.

They have one of those.

It's called an "Ar-15"

 

[enefgee]

The VZ in every category except 'breakability'

They have one of those.

It's called an "Ar-15"

Dude, you're on FIRE today - love it

 

[Beniw765]

Having owned both , I have to say hands down VZ58.
SU-16 is a flimsy , gimmicky , piece of $hi+. VZ58 is a tested proven design , rock solid construction and comes in many configurations , also has tons on after market accessories.

 

[*MALICE*]

Dude, you're on FIRE today - love it

Thank you. I'm here all night. Try the fish.

 

[aiwa]

Yeah, I'd also go VZ. Im not a fan of the way the adjustable butt stock appears to be tacked on the SU.

 

[Deckard]

Except it's nothing like the AR. But I suppose there are fans of plastic upper ARs. That always turns out well.

 

[remyltr]

VZ

get it in 7.62x39 for more fun

oh yes it is

 

[paintgunner]

I bet you'll get more longevity out of a VZ