Now thats just ignorant, The 17 was released in 1988 and the 20 was released in 1990. The glock 20 has seen 3 significant version changes since it's release and I am talking the difference between the first ones made that were imported from austria directly to the canadian market and those available today. As far as warranty goes the gun was shipped to glock USA and was returned to me saying that it was wear and tear and was not covered. They tried to say that there was many more rounds fired out of it than I claimed and would not do anything for me. I'm just trying to be helpfull and give some real hands on input.Bartledan said:I call BS. Glock has a superb warranty, and that gun would have been replaced in no time, had it actually broken.
Never mind that the only gen 1 pistol was the G17. Everything else came out for gen 2+
You my friend, are headed north, and talking out your lower-south.
Brian46 said:Now thats just ignorant, The 17 was released in 1988 and the 20 was released in 1990. The glock 20 has seen 3 significant version changes since it's release and I am talking the difference between the first ones made that were imported from austria directly to the canadian market and those available today. As far as warranty goes the gun was shipped to glock USA and was returned to me saying that it was wear and tear and was not covered. They tried to say that there was many more rounds fired out of it than I claimed and would not do anything for me. I'm just trying to be helpfull and give some real hands on input.
Sorry, my mistake the 17L was 1988.1982 was the year the austrian army decided on the 17. Here is your proof on there being 3 versions:http://atlantisarms.com/G20_Glock.htmlBartledan said:1982, for the G17. The only glocks to feature the gen 1 frame were the 17, 18, 18L, and the very first few 19s.
The first model 20s were relased for civilian sale in 1991, on gen 2 frames, and came through Smyrna. The frames are, and always have been made in Austria. Please provide a source for your assertion that there have been 3 significant changes, and no, the introdution of a light rail is not a significant change.
Simply put, your story about a bad customer service experience from glock is so contrary to the experience of, well, everyone, it is difficult to believe.
Brian46 said:Sorry, my mistake the 17L was 1988.1982 was the year the austrian army decided on the 17. Here is your proof on there being 3 versions:http://atlantisarms.com/G20_Glock.html
Read the article below the specs, There are also other pages if you need more proof.
The GLOCK 20 has undergone 3 major revisions since its introduction and current models are called 3rd generation GLOCK 20s.
The GLOCK 17 has undergone three major revisions since its introduction, so the current model is called the 3rd generation GLOCK 17.
The GLOCK 19 has undergone 3 major revisions since its introduction and current models are called 3rd generation GLOCK 19s.
The GLOCK 21 has undergone 3 major revisions since its introduction and current models are called 3rd generation GLOCK 21s.
The GLOCK 22 has undergone 3 major revisions since its introduction in 1990 and current models are called 3rd generation GLOCK 22s.
The GLOCK 23 has undergone three major revisions since its introduction and current models are called 3rd generation GLOCK 23s.
The GLOCK 24 has undergone 3 major revisions since its introduction and current models are called 3rd generation GLOCK 24s.
Bartledan said:Simply put, your story about a bad customer service experience from glock is so contrary to the experience of, well, everyone, it is difficult to believe.
BKP99 said:Is it just me or do plastic guns not last as long as they used to. Back in the 90's glocks lasted years and over 100 000 rounds, Chuck Taylor's torture test of one was quite impressive. Now I hear of KB's, breaking after low round counts.
I love the way the P99 fits and it's accuracy and reliability. However its proneness to breaking made me lose faith in it. I am switching to 9mm 1911's. I figure if it can take a .45 it should last forever with 9mm.
I guess I was lucky to get it backredleg said:I have never received good support from Glock. The average replacement time on damaged range guns is 2 years!! One of my Glock 34s lasted less than 5,000rds. It was sent to Glock for inspection in Nov 2003. Still no word.
Sorry but my experience with glock customer support closely mirrors that of Brian46.
I found that wearing gloves helped with the shifting in the hands. I had no choice due to the version one having virtually no texture on the frame.Armored Metal said:The one thing I would change on all models is that the grip does not have enough texture. After a good amount of shooting, the gun would shift a bit in my hands when they got a bit sweaty.
Armored Metal said:I test fired all three trigger s both in 9mm an .40. The trigger system that came out on top for me was the QA (Quick Action). It's like a smooth double action (App 8 pounds of pressure) with a short reset for follow-up shots. The DAO was horrible (too long and too heavy) and the TDA was OK but I do not like switching from first shot in DA to subsequent shots in SA.
The .40 was snappy but not uncomfortable. The 9mm, even though it's far from being my favorite calibre, was a pure pleasure to shoot and very controlable during double taps.
The one thing I would change on all s is that the grip does not have enough texture. After a good amount of shooting, the gun would shift a bit in my hands when they got a bit sweaty.



























