- Location
- Not really sure.
^.22 acorns or a .27 hilti cap
Digress indeed!Agreed and it was on my mind, however the .44 Special didn't debut until 1907, a nearly a full decade after the last legal antique. .44 Russian for sure, but loses some to the Special, while still being respectable. While there are a good few .44 Special conversions out there, not so sure that's going to last and a year and a half ago the RCMP was looking into closing the loophole on non pre-1898 chamberings. Haven't heard more since but I'm sure it's not forgotten, I just sincerely hope they don't axe the category in response to all the conversions to later cartridges, but I digress.
Digress indeed!
First, there is no loophole, you sound like an anti, there never should have been a "no list" and there wouldnt be the issue of using post 1898 brass. This situation was created by the regulations, get rid of the "no list" and you will cease to see any new "post 1898 chamberings". Put the blame where it belongs, on the people who created a list to prevent antiques from being enjoyed. Once they finish "closing the loophole" they will simply move onto those who reload. Come on guys, they do this all the time, we know how it goes.
Second, factory 44 special was loaded to the exact same 750FPS as 44 russian. It was loaded to that level because factories loading it realized rechambering the obsolete 44 russian to 44 special was extremely common in the early 1900's. So although the history of Elmer Keith hot loading his S&W triple locks in 44 special has created a powerful reputation for 44 special, those loadings would grenade an antique gun in short order. So anyone that says that using brass from 1907 is turning an antique into a modern gun is an idiot doing the bidding for the other side, they can only withstand mild loads regardless of the brass being used.
Digress indeed!
First, there is no loophole, you sound like an anti, there never should have been a "no list" and there wouldnt be the issue of using post 1898 brass. This situation was created by the regulations, get rid of the "no list" and you will cease to see any new "post 1898 chamberings". Put the blame where it belongs, on the people who created a list to prevent antiques from being enjoyed. Once they finish "closing the loophole" they will simply move onto those who reload. Come on guys, they do this all the time, we know how it goes.
Second, factory 44 special was loaded to the exact same 750FPS as 44 russian. It was loaded to that level because factories loading it realized rechambering the obsolete 44 russian to 44 special was extremely common in the early 1900's. So although the history of Elmer Keith hot loading his S&W triple locks in 44 special has created a powerful reputation for 44 special, those loadings would grenade an antique gun in short order. So anyone that says that using brass from 1907 is turning an antique into a modern gun is an idiot doing the bidding for the other side, they can only withstand mild loads regardless of the brass being used.



























