What can you tell me about this P14 target rifle.

bdft

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
205   0   1
I'm sure some of you guys have shot these in competition. A Remington P14 in 7.62x51 with British proofs. Who was E. Cooke? What kind of competitions were these rifles shot in? I loaded up 44 grns of H4895 behind a 150 grn bullet and it was accurate as hell for some reason.

afuUL1o.jpg


W4VFwR1.jpg


QjPPEHj.jpg
 
Rifles like this were used in Provincial Rifle Association and Dominion of Canada Rifle Association (PRA/DCRA) matches. Probably in the '70s into the '90s. Initially it would have been used with 7.62x51 ball.
E. Cooke may have been the 'smith who installed the 7.62 barrel. The barrel will likely have a 1:14 twist. Try 155gr Sierra Match Kings or equivalent Hornady or Nosler bullets, with perhaps 46gr Varget. I think you will find that it shoots well to 900m.
 
Last edited:
Rifles like this were used in Provincial Rifle Association and Dominion of Canada Rifle Association (PRA/DCRA) matches. Probably in the '70s into the '90s. Initilly it would have been used with 7.62x51 ball.
E. Cooke may have been the 'smith who installed the 7.62 barrel. The barrel will likely have a 1:14 twist. Try 155gr Sierra Match Kings or equivalent Hornady or Nosler bullets, with perhaps 46gr Varget. I think you will find that it shoots well to 900m.
The other possibility is the 168gn SMK bullet.

I agree, these rifles were almost all set up to shook SMKs optimally. It was the go-to back then for most everyone.
 
You may find that 168SMKs are very accurate at shorter ranges; they were originally designed for International style 300m competition. They my lose their way at longer ranges. I have observed them keyholing at 800.
When this rifle was set up - and whoever did it knew what he was doing - Gov't issue NATO ball with the 147gr bullet was standard. When this ammunition was no longer issued, better ammunition with superior bullets became standard, and the bullets designed for the Palma match, like the 155SMK were preferred. Rules limited bullet weight. These competitions are shot at 300y/m out to 900m/1000y.
During the period when this rifle was competitive, it was common for serious shooters to have two rifles for the matches. One with front locking lugs like yours for the shorter ranges, and another built up on a No. 4 action for the long ranges. It was the belief that the rear locking Lee Enfield would shoot rounder groups at long range with issue ball than a front locking action. Once NATO ball was no longer supplied, this practice was abandoned, the No. 4s disappeared, and rifles like yours were used at all distances. In time rifles built up on ex-service actions were displaced by rifles made up on dedicated precision target actions.
Anyway, you have yourself a fine vintage target rifle. Assuming a decent bore, it will shoot very well. Do you have assorted inserts for the front sight? Selecting the appropriate insert optimizes the sight picture.
 
Last edited:
That's the kind of info I was looking for. Thanks. Interestingly enough, I have a No. 4 Longbranch rechambered to 7.62 so I guess I have a matched set. I also have a set of inserts that I bought for my .22 BSA Martini Cadet but I have yet to experiment with them.
 
Front aperture "inserts" - maybe common knowledge, but I had bought a target front sight from a CGN poster who has higher end reputation in "old days" Palma shooting - his note with that sight suggested to use a generous size insert in front, when shooting at black bull's eye targets - will get smaller groups with good sized "rim of white" showing around the bullseye - was sort of counter intuitive to me - would have thought to more closely match the visual - but I have never won the Queen's Prize (he did), I am not listed in DCRA Hall of Fame (he is) and I have never been on Canada's Palma Team - (he was, like 13 times, both as shooter and as coach).
 
This particular gun came with a circle insert that was a bit bigger than the target at 100 yards. I just centered the target and sent it. I doubt I would have done any better with a scope. It will take some practice to get consistent though.
 
If you do want to stretch out its legs out and up to 1000m, give consideration to the Berger 155.5 Grain Fullbore target bullets.
Sized similar to the 175 smk, but an ogive and bearing surface that should work with a 14 twist
 
As I understood - in "old days", was a PALMA competition rule that 7.62 NATO rounds could use bullets in that competition that weighed maximum of 155 grains. I believe that was decided at a meeting at the PALMA competition held in Raton, New Mexico in August, 1992 - Sierra 155 grain, Winchester case, Fed 210M primer and 44.8 grains IMR 4895 to be used in future PALMA Matches. Sierra apparently put some work and marketed #2155 bullets which appear to had become THE bullet to use. Reading that later, more work by Sierra and some tweaks to ogive shape and boat-tail angle resulted in an "improved" bullet - Sierra 155 grain #2156 - for that very long range stuff - is alleged to carry similar to their 175 grain Match bullets. I am not certain what is used today - I am not sure if that 155 grain bullet weight limit is still in place?
 
I believe the bullet cannot exceed 156gr.
Palma is not the same as DCRA/PRA competition. Different matches, courses of fire.
 
Back
Top Bottom