What do we have here?

Moe

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
49   0   0
Location
Fredericton
An elderly gentleman approached me as I have antique handguns and wanted to know if this gun he acquired as a youth and now registered as prohibited could be an antique and removed from the registry. This to facilitate passing it on to family easier. I explained the 12(7) thing but he does not want to burden family with getting an RPAL. So any ideas out there?

Thanks for helping out.

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail (1).jpg

thumbnail (2).jpg

thumbnail (3).jpg

thumbnail (4).jpg

thumbnail (6).jpg

thumbnail (7).jpg

thumbnail (8).jpg

thumbnail (9).jpg
 

Attachments

  • thumbnail.jpg
    thumbnail.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 501
  • thumbnail (1).jpg
    thumbnail (1).jpg
    99.7 KB · Views: 499
  • thumbnail (2).jpg
    thumbnail (2).jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 493
  • thumbnail (3).jpg
    thumbnail (3).jpg
    90 KB · Views: 496
  • thumbnail (4).jpg
    thumbnail (4).jpg
    85.1 KB · Views: 497
  • thumbnail (6).jpg
    thumbnail (6).jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 495
  • thumbnail (7).jpg
    thumbnail (7).jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 493
  • thumbnail (8).jpg
    thumbnail (8).jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 493
  • thumbnail (9).jpg
    thumbnail (9).jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 494
No manufacturer's marks visible, so no records to access

I don't recognize any of the proof marks

Without that information, the pistol is going to be next to impossible to date and re classified to antique status.
 
The style is that of the "Hero" pistol although most of the originals are brass framed with steel barrels.
I recall that Dixie sold a modern steel framed version as well as an all brass model but to the best of my memory they were all 41 caliber, 31 was common in the originals.
I've never seen this type with a riveted hammer pin rather than a screw, and mainsprings of the era were single leaf.

Your example certainly has the "look' of age to it but I must concur with bearhunter regarding reclassification.
 
Proof marks difficult to decipher, but could be Belgian.: The highly stylized script letters "EL" to indicate provisional proof...muzzleloading shotguns and smoothbored pistols. In use after 1853. Mark next to it might be a "perron"..indicating that the firearm passed final proof. However, this mark is so badly corroded that positive identification is next to impossible.
Mainspring is an obvious replacement and of much later date than the pistol. Original likely broke and strips of spring steel used as a cheap fix. Likely also the case with the hammer pivot screw. Original lost or badly damaged. Condition of other screw heads suggests this was likely the case. So a rivet of about the same diameter substituted.
Bearhunter is correct. Next to impossible to date and classify as an antique.
 
Last edited:
I am grasping at straws but if you have a large scrap yard near you, they may have a scanning gun which will tell you what elements are in the barrel and frame. If you are really lucky and can have it scanned in small segments along the barrel and butt, you might find the metal is not homogenous. Modern barrels and frames would be homogenous in composition but the tough part would be getting the RCMP to accept that the gun is made of wrought iron and that such metal was not used in modern times

cheers mooncoon
 
Proof marks difficult to decipher, but could be Belgian.: The highly stylized script letters "EL" to indicate provisional proof...muzzleloading shotguns and smoothbored pistols. In use after 1853. Mark next to it might be a "perron"..indicating that the firearm passed final proof. However, this mark is so badly corroded that positive identification is next to impossible.
Mainspring is an obvious replacement and of much later date than the pistol. Original likely broke and strips of spring steel used as a cheap fix. Likely also the case with the hammer pivot screw. Original lost or badly damaged. Condition of other screw heads suggests this was likely the case. So a rivet of about the same diameter substituted.
Bearhunter is correct. Next to impossible to date and classify as an antique.

Belgian is my guess, too. Lots of simple cheap Belgian guns from that time.
 
In any event this piece is not really anything special and probably not worth any effort to get "antiqued". An interesting paperweight that unfortunately will be sacrificed to our silly rules regarding these old style things. Real value on it would be -I think- less than $200-
 
In any event this piece is not really anything special and probably not worth any effort to get "antiqued". An interesting paperweight that unfortunately will be sacrificed to our silly rules regarding these old style things. Real value on it would be -I think- less than $200-

I get that but he got this when he was a teen and now in his 70's wants to see this gun passed on to family. It is about personal value and family.

Cheers
Moe
 
Back
Top Bottom