What do you guys think of my 10/22 chassis?

Nice work!

I would like to see the brake the same diameter as the bbl, and a 'nordic' trigger gap filler in between the grip and the trigger.
 
My apologies I forgot that a muzzle device could be used for overall length. That's what happens when you get too many gun laws that don't make any sense but again very cool stock looks like a Rhineland arms rail stock with a very cool twist
 
I think it looks great and I would be interested in purchasing it. There are not many good options for a good AR style chassis for the 10/22.
Any plans to do a version that works with the takedown 10/22?
 
alkali_feldspar said:
It's got a 12.5" Dlask on it. I have a muzzle brake on there to make sure the OAL of >26" so it's still NR with the stock collapsed.
Click to expand...

Muzzle devices don't contribute to overall length. You've got a restricted device on your hands.

And yes, i have that in writing from the cfo. Search my started threads for the one about this very topic.

Although there is also talk of the muzzle device on the Troy PAR being counted to bring that to NR length, so maybe the cfo doesn't know jack. Or the lab. Or both...
 
Last edited:
Suther said:
Muzzle devices don't contribute to overall length. You've got a prohibited device on your hands.

And yes, i have that in writing from the cfo. Search my started threads for the one about this very topic.

Although there is also talk of the muzzle device on the Troy PAR being counted to bring that to NR length, so maybe the cfo doesn't know jack. Or the lab. Or both...
Click to expand...

Muzzle devices do not count towards barrel length. The CFO will tell you that. You can't put a 2.5" long muzzle brake on a 16" barrel to make it 18.5". However muzzle brakes do count towards the overall length of the rifle. In the case of rim-fire rifle there is no barrel length requirements, and this 12.5" Dlask barrel is perfectly legal. As long as the rifle, in it's most collapsed form, is longer than 26".

The pictured 10/22 is 26.5" with the stock fully collapsed and no muzzle brake. It's non-restricted, not restricted, and most defiantly not prohibited.
 
alkali_feldspar said:
Muzzle devices do not count towards barrel length. The CFO will tell you that. You can't put a 2.5" long muzzle brake on a 16" barrel to make it 18.5". However muzzle brakes do count towards the overall length of the rifle. In the case of rim-fire rifle there is no barrel length requirements, and this 12.5" Dlask barrel is perfectly legal. As long as the rifle, in it's most collapsed form, is longer than 26".

The pictured 10/22 is 26.5" with the stock fully collapsed and no muzzle brake. It's non-restricted, not restricted, and most defiantly not prohibited.
Click to expand...

Again, i have it in writing from the cfo.

"Thank you for your correspondence.

When measuring the length of barrel and/or firearm, accessories like flash suppressors or muzzle brakes can not be included in the measurement. Therefore, a muzzle brake will not count towards the overall length.

If you have any further questions, you may also call 1-800-7361-4000"

By all means, I'd love to be proven wrong, but this was what the cfo told me when i inquired.
 
Brakes DO NOT count for OAL, "unless" they are permanently attached. A threaded on brake that has been Loc-Tite(d) is NOT permanently attached.
 
I can hit gophers with my factory 10/22 hardwood carbine regularily out to 100 yards+. Spending copious amounts of $$ to change the chassis won't make the gopher any more dead. I'll pass and put the extra $$ into ammo. Remember you did ask what we thought. That's my thoughts.
 
Its nice to see that shiny new rivet on your assault clip...you know I just feel a little bit safer now ;0)
 
for OAL couldn't you just put a rivet in the buffer tube so that it wouldn't close all the way? looks pretty sweet BTW haters are always hating.
 
alkali_feldspar said:
It's got a 12.5" Dlask on it. I have a muzzle brake on there to make sure the OAL of >26" so it's still NR with the stock collapsed.
Click to expand...

alkali_feldspar said:
The pictured 10/22 is 26.5" with the stock fully collapsed and no muzzle brake. It's non-restricted, not restricted, and most defiantly not prohibited.
Click to expand...


A measuring tape should take the mystery out of it...
 
ACEPWN said:
for OAL couldn't you just put a rivet in the buffer tube so that it wouldn't close all the way? looks pretty sweet BTW haters are always hating.
Click to expand...

Nope. Overall length is determined by the design of the piece. My buddy epoxied the hinge on his 10-22 folding stock, only to be told by the cfo that if it was designed as a folding stock, its always a folding stock regardless of modifications made. Needless to say he's pretty unimpressed...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom