what is the biggest game can Tikka T3 .270 win hunt ?

Speaking of handloading to use certain bullets (proud 338 300 grain woodleigh and 275 Speer and woodleigh 196 grain rn 8mm fan here) how on earth has no one brought these bad boys up?

img_20190515_1231421_rewind_kindlephoto-278381951-jpg.135983

Something something "slippery" something something sectional density
 
338 win mag was offered at the beginning in 300 gr with the old silver tip bullet, remember seeing them but the user did not like what they were doing on just red deer: too much meat wasted and the bullet did not keep a lot all together.
 
Until Sako, Norma, Federal, Hornady will test shoot loads in my rifle, seat to the lands of my chamber, alter the powder charge in increments to find the node, load the temp stable powder I want for -40 to +40, load light to mid weight monos, in Lapua brass… yes. Yes handloads win.

Plus, it’s fun. Which is all 99% of us in the hunting forum ever do anyhow, nitpick minutiae. Handloading’s the ultimate expression of the art.

My question would be ,
Do you believe that all companies are selling their best components to the re-loader or using them in fac loads
My Kimber happens to be a perfect match /chamber/barrel and a specific lot of fac ammo
Also I know that winchester and their WSM cal's did not offer to the re-loader the same powder blend
Re-loading has it's place but not as loud as once was, especially in the hunting scene
My thoughts
 
Last edited:
338 win mag was offered at the beginning in 300 gr with the old silver tip bullet, ...

Not really. At the beginning, the .338 Winchester Magnum cartridge was offered with a 250 grs. ST(Exp) bullet and a 300 grs. PP(SP) bullet. ST(Exp) for Silvertip Expanding and PP(SP) for Power-Point Soft Point, of course.

I had a .338 Winchester Magnum rifle - at the beginning.
 
Not really. At the beginning, the .338 Winchester Magnum cartridge was offered with a 250 grs. ST(Exp) bullet and a 300 grs. PP(SP) bullet. ST(Exp) for Silvertip Expanding and PP(SP) for Power-Point Soft Point, of course.

I had a .338 Winchester Magnum rifle - at the beginning.

I wasn't around but I have it in my head that the 338 and 264 did not originally have the Magnum suffix, any comment?
 
I wasn't around but I have it in my head that the 338 and 264 did not originally have the Magnum suffix, any comment?

I've not known either to not have the "magnum" term attached to the chambering. I can't imagine that during the late 50 and 60s magnum craze that they would ignore attaching that handle to those. Both were bigger than the 30-06 class cartridge and both were on belted cases.
 
The 338 was labeled magnum in the first 1959 Winchester ads.
The 264 Model 70 Westerner introduced in 1960 was also referred to as the 264 magnum in Winchester ads.
 
Last edited:
This discussion about factory vs reloads has piqued my interest. I've reloaded for the last 30 years, so I dont have much reason or need to buy factory centerfire ammo. A couple of years ago, I picked up a Brno Zkk in 270 Win. The bedding was off, so I glass bedded it. Its a mauser style action, which I've done before, so I was reasonably confident with the work.
At the time, I wasnt set up to reload for 270, so I went to the LGS and bought a box of Winchester standard cup and core bullets (Power-Point??). Went to the range, zero'd the rifle at 50, then proceeded to the 100 y line. Took 5 shots, walked to the target, and saw a shotgun style pattern that covered a 16 inch circle. I called it a day, went back home, checked the usual suspects, and changed the scope to a known-to-be-good Leupold VX III. Went back to the range the next day, and the results were the same.
I mentioned this matter to a buddy of mine, and he announced that he had the reloading gear for 270 Win. I went to his place with my fired brass and loaded up a dozen rounds with Hornady SP Interlocks and a modest charge of H4350. Back to the range I went, and proceeded to shoot several very nice groups, generally 1 -1.5 MOA, which is good by my skill level. I then went back to the Winchester factory ammo (same bullet weight BTW), and shot miserable groups.
Needless to say, I will stick to reloading going forward. As others have stated, I enjoy the load "tuning" process, and find it very satisfying to get the full accuracy potential out of a rifle. Today, when I go to the LGS and see all the "premium" ammo with names spouting superlatives such as ultra, precision, maxi, etc I tend to think that ammo marketing has gone the way of beer and feminine hygene products. And if they can sell this stuff at 60$ a box, then their marketing dept deserves a medal.
 
I wasn't around but I have it in my head that the 338 and 264 did not originally have the Magnum suffix, any comment?

Yes. I will comment. As far as I can tell, the 338 Winchester Magnum was a cartridge with a Magnum suffix - from the beginning.

Gun Digest Thirteenth Edition - 1959, page 199, New Winchester Cartridges, by some dude named Kenneth L. Waters.

"... two new cartridges which have just been announced - the 338 Winchester Magnum and the 264 Winchester Magnum."
 
Considering the cost of factory ammo vs components, handloading is certainly saving me money, of late. Back to the original question, the largest game I have seen taken with a 270 were bison, muskox, and moose. Wouldn't be my personal first choice, but I wouldn't feel undergunned either. - dan
 
Last edited:
I saw today some R-P 223 55gr SP for $49.99 in CTC. Sticker shock fits the bill here.

I was in Canadian Tire today and while most ammo was expensive they surprisingly had some affordable ammo like Winchester grey box 6.5 creedmoor for 34.99$ and Hornady whitetail 300 win 150gr interlocks for 33.99$. Bought abit of both.
 
Back
Top Bottom