What is this.......VZ 58 .223, normal?

Nitroxrunsthrume

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
My .223 is having some issues and im wondering if this has anything to do with it
Photoon2013-07-02at15387_zps9da83a6e.jpg

there is a build up of metal "weld or solder" and the part its self sits higher than it should but on my 7.62x39 this same part is recessed and very well machined with no metal filler added

this is my 7.62x39 as you can see very clean and recessed
Photoon2013-07-01at07515_zps4634a196.jpg



this is pic of the .223 showing again the raised metal and part and sloppy metal work, on a side note whats with the two rough holes where there should be only one
Photoon2013-07-01at07514_zps8a98ed61.jpg


this is a brand new VZ 58 SA .223 under warranty and the only work done was done by North sylva on the broken firing pin:confused:
 
wow, that looks shotty
curioius what people who own them/know about them have to say

I don't recall having that sort of thing on my rifle (and I'm pretty anal, so I would remember that). Can you get a higher resolution picture of it?

Ben
 
I don't recall having that sort of thing on my rifle (and I'm pretty anal, so I would remember that). Can you get a higher resolution picture of it?

Ben

Ya sorry about the pics ill see what i can do, Also for comparison would you mind maybe shooting a pic of yours and posting it
 
Ya sorry about the pics ill see what i can do, Also for comparison would you mind maybe shooting a pic of yours and posting it

I will look and see if I have any existing pictures. Unfortunately mine went in for warranty and was not repairable, so I don't have it on hand to take pictures. I'll see what I can find though.

Ben
 
Is the weld part of the alteration to semi only?

Shouldn't be, IIRC the 858's had a block welded in to the receiver to prevent an auto sear being dropped it, but the CSA's are machined that way. Plus I don't think the ejector would require any mods either way. It does look weird.
 
Shouldn't be, IIRC the 858's had a block welded in to the receiver to prevent an auto sear being dropped it, but the CSA's are machined that way. Plus I don't think the ejector would require any mods either way. It does look weird.

Agreed - it does look weird.

I had a look an I don't have any pictures that will help. Sorry!

Ben
 
I feel like i was lied to....its not unfair or unreasonable for me to request a replacement .223 given the poor workmanship of the sloppy weld and un safe nature of my .223 vz
 
I need some real answers here......Im getting sick of wasting time, My VZ 58 is suffering from a CLEAR manufactures defect and i'm getting no real help at all, Is there any one out there that even gives a crap?
 
What is exactly wrong with it. You said it has an issue, but never said what the issue is. I can clearly see that, what ever the hell that thing is called, is sticking out more than mine is and your 7.62x39 Vz. Have you tried to remove it and see if there is something underneath it that's causing it to shim up a bit? Dirt maybe. If not then you could probably shim it down. But Id get into contact with CSA before doing anything yourself.
 
Should also keep in mind that a lot of the gun is hand made. Sure, the receiver, barrel and #### is made by a machine but the barrel is pressed in by a worker, the sight is pressed on, the whole gun is assembled by a worker. Jo Mc Blowslav may of ####ed up your gun well he or she was assembling it and decided to do a quick fix to hide there #### up so they don't get fired. The cool thing about CZ, they give you a card with the name, or several names, of the people who tested and examined your gun and even the name of the person who approved that is passed quality inspection. If you e-mail CZ with a quality control problem, they look up the serial number an know exactly who worked on that gun. I don't thinnk CSA does this because the do not give you this card that CZ does. The card CZ gives you is actually the warranty card. Would make sense to put the signatures of the inspectors on the warranty card.
 
Back
Top Bottom