As a suggestion from our esteemed friend Republic of Alberta I'm here to be schooled on what actually kills the big game animals we hunt.
Over in the thread http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=564067&page=4
I posted:
...it's the hole that kills, it must disrupt a vital part of the circulatory system or the CNS to result in death during the time-frame that we are interested in. (puncturing the large intestine will result in death for most game animals; but it will result from septicemia, and may take more than a week). Having the hole expand from 7 mm to 14 mm will result on a larger wound, I'm all for added insurance; but let's look at it realisically, if you miss a structure that will result in a rapid fatality by 3.5 mm, and having the bullet expand by that much will result in a hit, you are running on the very thinnest of probabilies. <
So here I am with an open mind, explain to me, if you can, why there is a significant difference in "killing power" between a non-expanding 7mm bullet and an expanding 7mm bullet.
And for the sake of argument, let's discount the probability of the non-expanding bullet tumbling in the wound tract.
And in case you're wondering, I'm not trolling, if I have any misconceptions here, I really do want some better information.
Over in the thread http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=564067&page=4
I posted:
...it's the hole that kills, it must disrupt a vital part of the circulatory system or the CNS to result in death during the time-frame that we are interested in. (puncturing the large intestine will result in death for most game animals; but it will result from septicemia, and may take more than a week). Having the hole expand from 7 mm to 14 mm will result on a larger wound, I'm all for added insurance; but let's look at it realisically, if you miss a structure that will result in a rapid fatality by 3.5 mm, and having the bullet expand by that much will result in a hit, you are running on the very thinnest of probabilies. <
So here I am with an open mind, explain to me, if you can, why there is a significant difference in "killing power" between a non-expanding 7mm bullet and an expanding 7mm bullet.
And for the sake of argument, let's discount the probability of the non-expanding bullet tumbling in the wound tract.
And in case you're wondering, I'm not trolling, if I have any misconceptions here, I really do want some better information.



















































