What kind of rifle is this? Police called over it.

It s all about teaching subliminal thinking guns = horror so even a picture of a gun will illicit the reaction they want to portray.People are being brainwashed and the social media is a perfect tool for it.Control the social media and you control peoples thought process especially true for the young
 
An older neighbour in his 80's told me he used to hunt birds on the way to school back in the 50's . When he got to school dropped his shotgun at the principals office. When school was dismissed he picked his shotgun up at the office and hunted on the way home. Try that nowadays.
 
Teachers and police are descending to the bottom of my respectable profession lists. I can say I hate each bureaucracy with equal distain… it’s quickly becoming a distaste for the people within the organization as well. They make up the mass that send my stomach into a knot.
 
Mike Webb said:
An older neighbour in his 80's told me he used to hunt birds on the way to school back in the 50's . When he got to school dropped his shotgun at the principals office. When school was dismissed he picked his shotgun up at the office and hunted on the way home. Try that nowadays.
Click to expand...

A 22 across your bike handlebars. Leave it in the office. Shoot gophers in the ball field during recess and lunch. Actually appreciated since people could break and ankle in the holes.

There's probably 4x the people in Kanada as there were then, and everyone has a smartphone many times better than any PC available 20 years ago. Obviously, leftist media(is there any other kind) and access to misinformation. Social programing and propaganda. Victim culture and power happy politicians using political theatre to pander for votes.
 
When I was young and before I had a drivers license and a car to drive I use to take a bus out to a rural area to hunt.My gun folded down into my knapsack and nothing was showing to give anyone any idea what I was doing (or I thought).One day the bus driver on the way back home asked me how the rabbit hunting was going and I laughed and told him pretty good (that day I had shot four).Well I ended up giving him a pair and got a free ride and whenever he was on if I got some rabbits he always made out good.We had many a good chat about hunting,he was a real nice old fella..I sure miss those old times stuff like that does n t happen anymore especially given that fact having the gun on the bus today would land me in jail lol
 
So they didn't just lock down this school, they also locked down surrounding schools?!? And now they have grief counsellors available to help people deal with the trauma?!?!?!?

So help us if we ever had real hardship to deal with, this generation wouldn't last a day!
 
Callee said:
So they didn't just lock down this school, they also locked down surrounding schools?!? And now they have grief counsellors available to help people deal with the trauma?!?!?!?

So help us if we ever had real hardship to deal with, this generation wouldn't last a day!
Click to expand...

“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf
 
The long and short of it is In this day and age bringing ANY open firearm or even a replica into a school without some prior discussion or plan is simply fookling STUPID. The teacher was 100% in the wrong here.
 
Can agree, little stupid foresight in planning would have been great. I do not think that the “norm” dictates what’s right or wrong. I for one will never blindly follow something I disagree with if it isn’t causing harm to someone else.

Was it 100% necessary to have locked down a bunch of schools and send in crisis teams to deal with something that didnt even happen? Well only if it was indeed 100% wrong, but maybe it’s more like stupid people doing stupid things.
 
Gindryden said:
The long and short of it is In this day and age bringing ANY open firearm or even a replica into a school without some prior discussion or plan is simply fookling STUPID. The teacher was 100% in the wrong here.
Click to expand...

Not to get too philosophical, but i think there's different kinds of "wrong" .

Here's an analogy:

Stealing is wrong. As a moral principle, stealing is wrong.

So if stealing is morally wrong, then you should be able to leave your stuff around and trust that it will not get stolen. That is, in a perfect moral world, you should be able to leave your stuff unattended and not worry about theft.

In that sense, the person who leaves their car unlocked in a shady neighbourhood has not done anything morally wrong. They are not the one doing something wrong, the person who steals is the one who is wrong, yes?

But in a different sense, a practical sense rather than a moral sense, we all know that in a shady neighbourhood a smart person will lock their doors, and if you fail to lock up, you will be doing something wrong in the practical sense. Right?

And that distinction needs to be made here, i think.

The teacher bringing the inoperative vintage gun to school for a history lesson, that was 100% practically wrong, because we live in an age today where crazy sheltered gun-phobics are in charge, and a smart person would have known those crazies would lose their minds at the sight of an inoperative vintage gun in a school. So on a practical level, yes, the teacher should have known better.

But on a moral level, it's important to maintain that the history teacher is 0% wrong. There is absolutely nothing wrong, on a moral level, with bringing an inoperative vintage rifle to school to teach a history lesson. What moral principle does that break? None. In fact, with a motivation of giving kids a better education, the act was actually morally commendable.

And i think it's important that we make that distinction, because there's plenty of anti's today who would argue that any and all guns are inherently immoral, and that bringing that gun to school was not just practically wrong, but morally wrong as well, and we can't let that kind of idiocy stand without challenge.
 
Callee said:
Not to get too philosophical, but i think there's different kinds of "wrong" .

Here's an analogy:

Stealing is wrong. As a moral principle, stealing is wrong.

So if stealing is morally wrong, then you should be able to leave your stuff around and trust that it will not get stolen. That is, in a perfect moral world, you should be able to leave your stuff unattended and not worry about theft.

In that sense, the person who leaves their car unlocked in a shady neighbourhood has not done anything morally wrong. They are not the one doing something wrong, the person who steals is the one who is wrong, yes?

But in a different sense, a practical sense rather than a moral sense, we all know that in a shady neighbourhood a smart person will lock their doors, and if you fail to lock up, you will be doing something wrong in the practical sense. Right?

And that distinction needs to be made here, i think.

The teacher bringing the inoperative vintage gun to school for a history lesson, that was 100% practically wrong, because we live in an age today where crazy sheltered gun-phobics are in charge, and a smart person would have known those crazies would lose their minds at the sight of an inoperative vintage gun in a school. So on a practical level, yes, the teacher should have known better.

But on a moral level, it's important to maintain that the history teacher is 0% wrong. There is absolutely nothing wrong, on a moral level, with bringing an inoperative vintage rifle to school to teach a history lesson. What moral principle does that break? None. In fact, with a motivation of giving kids a better education, the act was actually morally commendable.

And i think it's important that we make that distinction, because there's plenty of anti's today who would argue that any and all guns are inherently immoral, and that bringing that gun to school was not just practically wrong, but morally wrong as well, and we can't let that kind of idiocy stand without challenge.
Click to expand...
Agreed, but it would seem the way he did this without a plan was again stupid on every level.
 
Callee said:
Not to get too philosophical, but i think there's different kinds of "wrong" .

Here's an analogy:

Stealing is wrong. As a moral principle, stealing is wrong.

So if stealing is morally wrong, then you should be able to leave your stuff around and trust that it will not get stolen. That is, in a perfect moral world, you should be able to leave your stuff unattended and not worry about theft.

In that sense, the person who leaves their car unlocked in a shady neighbourhood has not done anything morally wrong. They are not the one doing something wrong, the person who steals is the one who is wrong, yes?

But in a different sense, a practical sense rather than a moral sense, we all know that in a shady neighbourhood a smart person will lock their doors, and if you fail to lock up, you will be doing something wrong in the practical sense. Right?

And that distinction needs to be made here, i think.

The teacher bringing the inoperative vintage gun to school for a history lesson, that was 100% practically wrong, because we live in an age today where crazy sheltered gun-phobics are in charge, and a smart person would have known those crazies would lose their minds at the sight of an inoperative vintage gun in a school. So on a practical level, yes, the teacher should have known better.

But on a moral level, it's important to maintain that the history teacher is 0% wrong. There is absolutely nothing wrong, on a moral level, with bringing an inoperative vintage rifle to school to teach a history lesson. What moral principle does that break? None. In fact, with a motivation of giving kids a better education, the act was actually morally commendable.

And i think it's important that we make that distinction, because there's plenty of anti's today who would argue that any and all guns are inherently immoral, and that bringing that gun to school was not just practically wrong, but morally wrong as well, and we can't let that kind of idiocy stand without challenge.
Click to expand...

Very well put, sir.

Being "right" and being "taken down" by the tactical team are not mutually exclusive. This is a sad statement on where we are as a culture.
 
Honestly this #### been going on for years. in 2001 I nearly got expelled from highschool for a multi tool.

And it wasn't like I carried it in class either. I got to school, took it off my belt and put it in my locker. Just one day it happened to fall out and someone told the teachers. At the time I was in the reserves, so it was quite common and valuable tool. But because I wasn't the best of student, they tried to make it worst than it was. Bit hard to stab someone with a broken blade.
 
rajczak_kashka said:
That moron teacher with huge fake boobs in Ontario (of course) may as well brought a dildo to accompany his massive fake boobs….sick absolutely sick in the head. What’s even more sick is the school board and admin supporting this. Halton Ont once again….
Click to expand...

You realize he's a right wing troll and doesn't dress like that in normal life right? His goal is to get people like you mad at real Trans people.
 
Better question is how the complainant teacher didn't realize that the person with the gun was a fellow teacher. Or did they just poop their pants and hit the panic button along with 911...
 
Suther said:
You realize he's a right wing troll and doesn't dress like that in normal life right? His goal is to get people like you mad at real Trans people.
Click to expand...

Where does your information come from? I personally know a guy who worked with him (also a high school teacher) for years before the trans thing and can guarantee you that he's no right wing troll.
 
We'll never know all the details, of course, but if the teacher that called 911 did it knowing the object was a non-firearm, they should be charged with mischief, lose their job and face civil law suits. So tired of lowly school teachers exceeding their boundaries.

milsurpo
 
I have a Swedish uniform jacket that was crossed rifle pins sewed on it; the rifles are near an exact match to the one in the story.

Seems to be a matchlock
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom