What "Plastic" were first Ruger 10/22 Clips made From

Deerdr

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
161   0   0
Location
North Bay ON
The early 10/22 Clips were made from a nylon like "Plastic". The strong self lubricating material was called CELCON. Auth. The Sturm, Ruger 10/22 rifle and 44 Mag Carbine Book by. Duncan LONG
 
From your link:
A device, generally a strip of metal or plastic, used to hold loose cartridges together to facilitate faster loading of a rifle or magazine. A clip has no spring or follower, therefore a magazine is NOT a clip. And of course, vice versa.
 
The early 10/22 Clips were made from a nylon like "Plastic". The strong self lubricating material was called CELCON. Auth. The Sturm, Ruger 10/22 rifle and 44 Mag Carbine Book by. Duncan LONG

Okay, you're pointing out the type of plastic these magazines were made from, yet you're getting upset because someone corrects your terminology? Seems incongruous to me.

Terminology matters. Firearm owners are fighting an ignorant redneck reputation. Not knowing the correct terms for gun parts is ammunition for the antis. We don't have the luxury of being lazy about language. They will use it against us. They argue out of fear and ignorance. If we prove to them that we are as ignorant as they about firearms, then our position weakens. Knowing firearm terminology is all part of being responsible and safe. A clip is an entirely different device than a magazine. If you tried to load a 10/22 with a clip, the firearm wouldn't function, or it would become dangerous to the user. A clip feed ammunition into a magazine and is always removable. A magazine holds ammunition waiting to be fed into battery. A magazine can be removable, but many are also integral to the firearm. It's like calling the urethra the bladder, if you'll excuse the image. Both handle urine, but do so differently and for a different purpose.
 
Last edited:
gun-maagazine.jpg


/thread :cool:
 
Not sure what the point of this thread is. Is there a question, or just the statement that the OP made? I have a 25 year old 10/22 magazine and new ones, they seem pretty much the same to me.
 
QUOTE"Okay, you're pointing out the type of plastic these magazines were made from, yet you're getting upset because someone corrects your terminology? Seems incongruous to me.

Terminology matters. Firearm owners are fighting an ignorant redneck reputation. Not knowing the correct terms for gun parts is ammunition for the antis. We don't have the luxury of being lazy about language. They will use it against us. They argue out of fear and ignorance. If we prove to them that we are as ignorant as they about firearms, then our position weakens. Knowing firearm terminology is all part of being responsible and safe. A clip is an entirely different device than a magazine. If you tried to load a 10/22 with a clip, the firearm wouldn't function, or it would become dangerous to the user. A clip feed ammunition into a magazine and is always removable. A magazine holds ammunition waiting to be fed into battery. A magazine can be removable, but many are also integral to the firearm. It's like calling the urethra the bladder, if you'll excuse the image. Both handle urine, but do so differently and for a different purpose. "


Bla Blaaa Bla Blaaaa Blaaaaaa.... ;-)
 
Back
Top Bottom