For a long time wolverines has had eagle arms (Armalite) lowers for sale. These are forged and currently 9$ less (220$) then a stag yet I never see them mentioned when someone asks "what lower should I get"... Is there something I am missing?
STAG's parent company CMT is a sub-contractor for Colt/military contracts. As a result, they provide many of the parts that are used in US military M16/M4 rifles, thus they're true "mil-spec".
I am no AR expert...but have read enough that that *term "mil-spec" dosen't mean much. And when you are a sub-contracted to the actual holder of the military contract (Colt), that does not make you a first tier supplier (you are actaully nothing).
Stag/CMT are strictly civillian as well. Neither of them have military contracts.
It is just a case of people wishing their Stag...which they link to CMT...which they link to Colt..which they link to the Military is somehow better than the others...
Colt doesn't produce all their parts in house. They purchase massive quantities of parts from sub-contractors who MUST follow the military-specifications as set out in the contract signed by Colt and related contracts signed between CMT & Colt. That is where the term "mil-spec" came from. Since those specifications are in the public forum, any civilian company can choose to build their products to meet or exceed those specifications as set out in the military specifications for said contract. I don't know too many guys who wouldn't rank CMT/STAG in the upper tier of AR manufacturers. In fact, CMT is also the primary contractor/provider for parts for many well known civilian AR builders including S&W, RRA, etc...
My Stag is in fact "milspec". All rails, buffer tube threading, etc are made to meet military standards and will take all attachments made for the AR series of rifles. As for my issued C7a2, it is not "milspec". Considering it is made on Colt dies, it makes you wonder what exactly they are using to measure the parts. BUIS's and Larue parts will not fit on the railed upper and must be clearanced to fit into the gaps on the rail. Of course, it is easier to file the gaps out rather than ruining a perfectly good Larue product.
YMMV,
Stick with the Stag.
Hoddie
wow well summed up xman, I just finished reading this thread on arfcom as well http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=12&t=318113 very good info
Stag does indeed sound very good now, if only they had a cooler animal rollmarked onto them...![]()
THe only thing that concerns is the fire control parts. People don't seem to talk too much about the proper hardness of these parts.
I have a LMT lower on order - so I will report back in a month or two.
As for my issued C7a2, it is not "milspec".




























