Whats the Difference between the Savage Mkii FV-SR And the MKii-TRR-SR?

Bubblewhip

Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know the stock and longer barrel is obvious between the two, but why is the FV-SR MSRP $260

y368Zlzsj_1fzw1fMb3.png


and the TRR-SR is $605?

H5h7SUfhy_PnY58zEQ5.png


The price difference doesn't seem justified unless it was a real aluminum bedded stock. Why does Savage also list the TRR-SR as having a "wood stock?"
 
Those are the only differences, along with the goofy rail. And the trr sr IS a wood stock, painted and textured.

And that's a tr pictured not a trr sr. :)
 
I say good on savage for making all these fine firearms affordable... For 260 can you really beat the tv-sr? The mk2 is just for the guy who wants a little nicer gun for a lot more money ... And there are a lot of them around
 
I say good on savage for making all these fine firearms affordable... For 260 can you really beat the tv-sr? The mk2 is just for the guy who wants a little nicer gun for a lot more money ... And there are a lot of them around

IMO the TRR-SR is well worth the extra $$ I paid 499.99 for mine in 17hmr. There is no comparison between the FV and Boyds Stocks, the only gun I have ever sold was an FV because I hated the stock.
 
I have the TRR-SR and really like it. I think I paid $480 for it a year and a half ago. Removed the rail and put an EWG rail on. I wanted the Boyds stock because it's very close to a McMillan A5 which I have on my 308. Cheaper to shoot more often. Very accurate, with right ammo will group under .5" @ 50M 5 shot groups.
 
The FV-SR has the cheap tupperware stock with bent forend that tilts the rifle with a bipod, touches the barrel and rolls over in sandbags. Way too small for an adult and no cheek weld without a riser. They are still tack drivers even with the open cave of a bedding area. I regret selling mine.
 
Yah the cheap stock on the "F" is why it's cheaper.
It feels like it's worth about oh $40 or so.
So you pay a premium for anything with a boyds.

The "F" is useless with a scope. However it might be OK with iron sights for a kid.
 
I got the TRR-SR because from what I understood we can't get the Boyd's tacticool stock anymore?
Plus the woodstock is nice, even though you cant really even tell its wood.
 
trr sr has a threaded barrel i think

Purdy sure it's the other way around, or atleast I know the fv does according to the reviews I've read, but I believe the trr is heavier. I've been thinking of picking up the fv for a while now. I don't watch a lot of his videos, but nutnfancy has a decent review on it.
 
Theres the TR, then there is the TRR-SR!

SR means Supressor Ready (meaning threaded), either FV-SR or TRR-SR... both threaded, However the TR = not threaded.
 
I think the advantage of the plastic stock is that it is very light; there's a distinct difference between the Boyds wooden stocks and the plastic stock as far as the weight goes. The Boyds wooden stocks offer lots of advantages and the Macmillan grip is truly magnificent; I was a certified sceptic (read ignorant) of that stock style until I shot one and now I am a firm believer. The plastic is very light in comparison and I think it's some what of a field rifle and easier to carry when out hunting or gopher shooting. The accuracy will suffer but as Kevin Costner was told by his caddy Cheech Marin in the movie Tin Cup, getting it on the green is good enough (if you take my meaning). How accurate does it have to be at 25 to 50 yards? The movement of the forend can be a little disconcerting but if it does the job no matter...I think Savage has produced a line that suits many people...good for them, they are really sensational little rifles but seriously don't work the bolt like Nutnfancy does, it's not a Lee Enfield! Just pick the one that fits your needs and if you have multiple needs buy a couple!
 
The TRR has a laminated boyds target stock and a once piece tri-sided rail(you pay a lot for this rail..the Savage TR is cheaper and doesn't come with that crap). It also has a painted finish on it(duracoat?) similar to what's on the stock rather than bluing.

I guess long story short...ones a target rifle and the other is a plinker. My TR will do well under an inch with target ammunition at 100m. Personal best is 0.65"...and it was not a calm day.
 
Back
Top Bottom