Which rifle do you recommend!?

S

saxtef

New member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey guys,

I'm new to this site and have started really getting into backcountry hunting as my primary hobby. That being said, in my arsenal I have a Tikka T3 hunter stainless in 30-O6 with a Burris 3x9 optic. The gun is a bit heavy for my liking cause I do a ton of walking.

I love Tikka, and heck if I could afford a Sako I would splurge. I'm in BC and want a gun that gives me a wide range of versatility as a backup or even primary gun in a different calibre. Was looking at the Tikka T3X lite in 300 WSM.

What are you guy's thoughts for that gun and calibre for a big game (mule and up) rifle?

If you have any thoughts about which size 'VORTEX' scopes to get, feel free to chime in!

Cheers!
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but don't the tikka short actions still have the same size action as the long actions? If that's the case in this particular rifle I would go for the 300 win mag over the short mag as there will be no real weight savings and the 300 win can run the heavier bullets due to the larger case capacity. I'm not a tikka expert by any stretch but with out the shorter action I don't see a reason for the wsm in this platform.
 
I don't quite get why people don't like the use of plastics in firearms. I'd much rather have a plastic (synthetic) magazine than a metal one. The metal ones are prone to rust and the lips can deform creating feeding problems. There is a lot of plastic used in industry. Look at the M16 and several other military arms that use plastics. They have to survive severe military trials to get a pass. Plastic does the job.
 
If you are buying a tikka ln a 300 7mag or 300wsm be sure to go to the dentist and make sure each and every tooth and filling is solid because when you shoot you will feel each one make an attempt to rattle out.
I love my tikkas but anything in the magnum spectrum is just not worth it. The 3006 is the best all around caliber out there no matter what anyone says. Maybe look at getting a lighter scope.
 
FLHTCUI said:
Yup, and they (94 in terdy-turdy) dont have plastic bolt shrouds either :wave:
Thk
Rob
Click to expand...

Recently picked up a pre 64 and ammo off EE. Looking forward to giving it a rip. Handles nice and is light. Plastic bolt shroud is pretty much the only thing I don't like about my A7....oh, replacement mags are a mint which is a downer as well.
 
I would check out the NEW Stainless Savage lightweight hunter.

40 inch OAL. 20 inch barrel. 5.6 lbs.

7mm-08 would be my choice loaded with 140gr Accubond.

SA_16LightweightHunter_Profile_wAmmo1.jpg


http://www.24outdoors.com/a-flyweight-wonder/
 
saxtef said:
Hey guys,

I'm new to this site and have started really getting into backcountry hunting as my primary hobby. That being said, in my arsenal I have a Tikka T3 hunter stainless in 30-O6 with a Burris 3x9 optic. The gun is a bit heavy for my liking cause I do a ton of walking.

I love Tikka, and heck if I could afford a Sako I would splurge. I'm in BC and want a gun that gives me a wide range of versatility as a backup or even primary gun in a different calibre. Was looking at the Tikka T3X lite in 300 WSM.

What are you guy's thoughts for that gun and calibre for a big game (mule and up) rifle?

If you have any thoughts about which size 'VORTEX' scopes to get, feel free to chime in!

Cheers!
Click to expand...

Why would you decide that you wanted what is essentially the same rifle? Sure it's a bit lighter and you'll get a little more velocity but not a significant amount or performance difference. I would have suggested that, if you want a different rifle, get the T3x Lite and go with a different cartridge in order to cover more range. If you want a backcountry rifle why not get a Superlight in 7mm-08 or, better yet, a Kimber Mountain Ascent in 7mm-08 which runs 4 lb 13oz without scope? If you want light that is probably a smarter way to go. I couldn't find the weight on the Tikka Superlight but my inclination would be to go with the Kimber.
 
Going to have to agree with BUM on this one.Get a lightweight rifle like the Kimber or A Howa Alpine Mountain Rifle chambered in a short action round like 6.5 Creedmoor,7mm08,or 308 if you want to hunt the bigger critters like elk.your knees will thank you.I might pick up one of the Howas myself.

And why do you want a Vortex that have a great warranty but such dismal build quality when you can pick up a much more bomb proof scope like a Leupold.the last thing I want is my equipment failing on a hunt in the backcountry.
 
Kimber Montana. 30-06, 300 WSM, 300 Win. Or .270, 270 WSM, 7 Rem Mag if you're not married to the 30 cals or fixated on grizzlies.

All steel, stainless, CRF, carbon stock, light. Trigger that will put many of the customs to shame.
 
You make a very good point Uisge, that's exactly the information I was looking for! Thanks! i'll look into it!
 
big boar said:
I don't quite get why people don't like the use of plastics in firearms. I'd much rather have a plastic (synthetic) magazine than a metal one. The metal ones are prone to rust and the lips can deform creating feeding problems. There is a lot of plastic used in industry. Look at the M16 and several other military arms that use plastics. They have to survive severe military trials to get a pass. Plastic does the job.
Click to expand...


I prefer plastic in my firearms for that EXACT reason. Even wood stocks are hard to use in some rugged terrain.
 
Yotarunner said:
If you are buying a tikka ln a 300 7mag or 300wsm be sure to go to the dentist and make sure each and every tooth and filling is solid because when you shoot you will feel each one make an attempt to rattle out.
I love my tikkas but anything in the magnum spectrum is just not worth it. The 3006 is the best all around caliber out there no matter what anyone says. Maybe look at getting a lighter scope.
Click to expand...

Well said, thats the thing about calibre discussions everyone has a different opinion and swears by something else. The only reason I don't want a 30-O6 is because I already have one and wanted something different. But thanks for the input!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom