Having just spent a few hours playing in & outdoors with a Bushnell 3200 3-9X40, a 4200 2.5-10X40, a Leupold VX I 4-12X40, a VX II 2-7X33, a Vari-X II 2-7X33, A Burris Fullfield 3-9X40, a mini2-7X33(?), a Zeiss Conquest 3-9X40, and for something different, a Seeadler (made in germany) 30mm tube (all othere are 1") in 3-9X45, I noted some interesting things.
First off, I can see the difference between good and really good scopes, especially in evening and dusk hours. While all / any of them would work during daylight, although the color rendition of the 4200, the Zeiss, and the Seeadler are awesome, in the evening and darkness, the differences become much more noticeable.Especially if you're looking out from a doorway, for example, (ie: what's that noise in the corrals, while you're standing at the back door with a rifle?) I found very distinct differences in glare reduction and light gathering. Out of what I was playing with, in order of excellence, the Zeiss rocks! But, the 4200 was close behind, as was the Seeadler, and then the VX II. Excellent at reducing glare from lighting behind you, when looking out into the darkness. Out of the rest, I found that glare was enough of an issue to make clear ID of your targets an issue. But in terms of overall briteness, the 3200 seemed a wee bit brighter than the VX I and Vari X II, with the older Burris Fullfield next, and coming in last the Burris Mini (rather dark this one was). Clear and away, Zeiss is a nice scope. But the 4200 Bushnell and the Leupold VX II weren't all that far behind.
Either the 3200's or the VX I's are nice scopes, for sure, my personal edge would go to the 3200 with it's rainguard coating. But, if you plan on doing any hunting on the edge of the sun rise & sets, try & find the bucks for a 4200 or a VX II. Or a Zeiss!