This is from reputable sources such as Michael Zeleny who "wrote the book" on the P49/P210 pistols.
I've read his articles and while he certainly knows the history and production differences better than I do, he's as biased as he is knowledgable. Just as a quick example, comparing a ransom rested 50yd target to a hand fired 25m target as a test of mechanical accuracy; not a valid comparison. He has no engineering background that I can find, so everything he says about such things I disregard as opinion only, much of it misinformed (He's also riding the MIM hate train). He may have wrote the book, but it's a history book and nothing more.
I can only compare an early production P49, 210-2, Legend, and Legend Target as those are the only ones I have handled. It is very possible that later P49's were better due to an improved heat treatment process and other advances, but I doubt the end user can tell the difference. Things like that need destructive testing to determine, which firearms owners are unlikely to appreciate. Personal preferences vary, but so far I have yet to find a P210 I don't like.
Gdawg, your collection never fails to impress. Both are absolutely stunning.


















































