not!
Why,,,not pickina fight..was just lookin at a montana in 243,,,they seem well built,and freakin light.
not!
Definitely blown out of proportion.
The Mauser 98 is still the best LIGHTWEIGHT action made.
If you want a mountain rifle that doesn't have disposable plastic parts this is your gun.
The FN and Ruger are fine if you don't mind another 1/2+ pounds.
When you factor in the length of the Ruger action I think it is grossly overweight.
Ruger has good QC although the ring system blows.
I'm not sure why, but I have seen several that were severely misaligned.
Ruger would be my second choice.
Why,,,not pickina fight..was just lookin at a montana in 243,,,they seem well built,and freakin light.
The Scandinavian and German firearms are made better than arms made here or they wouldn't survive in the market over there. Shooters across the ocean demand quality. I'm amazed at the crap that North American shooters are willing to buy if the price is low enough. If you are willing to pay double the price of a typical North american firearm, the QC issues that many experience with all the cheapo guns simply go away. I have never seen a bad Sako, Blaser, Sauer, Merkel, Krieghoff, Anschutz etc. but have seen numerous bad Remingtons, Winchesters, Marlins, Savages, Rugers, etc. etc. I no longer buy North American firearms.[/QUOTE]
After my latest Marlin purchase and another fiasco with a new Mossberg, I'm with you on that one.....
Would agree, Ruger is probably the bottom of the barrel.



























