Why .308 a precision caliber?

D_ said:
Also a larger round will maintain a velocity a little better than a smaller round. Negative effects of windage will be less with a larger round.

The 270 does fly a little flatter I believe and with some great velocity. The military loves the 308 round and all the information/research has been done ten times over for us thanks to the us military. As always people love to use cartridges used by the army. 30-06 was big for a long time now its 308.

I'm some of the experts around here will enlighted us soon.

D_

I could be wrong but I thought the army now uses the 223.
 
dr said:
I could be wrong but I thought the army now uses the 223.

For the M16 modern varient of yes they do use the 223 Rem.

I was talking about the sniper rifle caliber which I believe is still mainly 308.

Could be wrong as more 50's and 338 Lapau are brought in.

D_
 
alberta tactical rifle said:
308 has been worked on to death by the military of many countries so there is a ton of info about what works and what doesn't.
270s can be decent shooters to be sure, but typically they shoot 150 gr and lower best, the 308s typically shoot 165 to 175 best. The fact that lighter bullets tend to be affected by wind more than heavy bullets do is 1 reason, also heavier bullets maintain supersonic speed longer (further down range)
308 also has light recoil and is a very efficient cartridge as less powder is used. The other real advantage any 30 caliber catridge enjoys is the sheer volume of bullet availability, from 110 gr to 295gr round nose to vld and ulds.
This just is not the case with many other calibers.
Another reason so many use 308 is there are a great number of precision type rifle offered in that caliber as a factory offering.
There is absolutely no reason that a 270 could not be made into a precision rifle, and with some custom bullets I would think 1 could do very well. The US shooting fraternity pretty much dictates what the world shoots, not that long ago 6.5 was a scoffed at caliber, a .264 dia bullet that weighs 140 grains was considered far too light to be useful, until some of the guys shooting 6.5x55 and then 6.5x284 started kicking ass at alot of the 1000 yard shoots in the US, now it is a very hot cartridge to use, but has taken time to gain acceptance with the BIG shots down south.
I was laughed at 25 years ago ,when I built a 7 Rem Mag F class rifle, until the results were posted. I found the same thing higher bc bullets, then built the rifle around the cartridge, and it worked very well.
I bet you never saw a .270 in benchrest or silloutte
 
Glock4ever said:
The .308 family is traditionally chosen as a precision caliber round because shorter rounds are inherently more accurate then their longer brothers. i.e. .308 Win vs. .30-06 Spfd. This is the reason many companies are pushing the short magnums and super short magnums, which have their roots in benchrest shooting where almost all the prime calibers are short and stubby. Another reason that shorter rounds are chosen is the efficiency that they can provide a reloader in terms of powder to velocity. Shorter rounds tend to burn less powder to achieve the same velocities with comparable weights in bullets. If you go to Sniper Country and Benchrest central there are numerous articles on the subject...
Glock$ ever very very well said, for me the short stubby is only way to go, look what the 6ppc, did to the 222, and 6.5/284 is doing and the wsm will do the same, why anyone would consider the ghost of Jack O'coonor over 270wsm or 7mmwsm or the 06 they are just better in ever way.
 
Back
Top Bottom