- Location
- Sault Ste. Marie
Just wondering all your opinions of why you pic .40 cal over .45 acp or vice versa. They seem so close to me. Reason I'm asking is I'm looking at Glocks and I notice that .40 cal seems to be selling more on the EE
Admitedly I like 'em all.
Single stack 1911 style .45 ACP for sure but also have 9mm's, a .40 and 10mm's off that platform, too.
Double stack 9mm my preference is to the BHP MkIII these days. Also have one in .40
As for the .40 itself I also have a G22 and a S&W 4006.
This after ~ 30 years of owning/shooting various handguns.
![]()
NAA.
So would you saw there is a big difference between .45 and .40 as far as proformance? Say stopping power and when shooting range contests like bowling pins
I shoot my 40 more than 45 cause it cost less to reload. .45 acp brass once fired $125 per K, 40 brass are $25 per K sometimes free
IMO since you are not concerned with defensive stopping power, .45 is just more expensive, thats it. I'd go .40 S&W.



























