- Location
- Prince George B.C.
Plastic or Steel
Plastic or steel?
As far as I can tell it boils down to personal preference.
I don't carry so I will leave that up to others to comment on.
For action shooting I don't think steel has quite the advantage it may have once had. During the 2008 IDPA Nationals many of the top shooters used plastic guns and some of those won their divisions.
Personally I prefer the plastic guns. I like the simplicity of the striker fired action. No external safety to contend with. Point and shoot. No doubt this is a hold-over from shooting revolvers.
I tried some steel guns but -for me- the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. I found the steel gun slower to draw and slower to drive from target to target. I also did not like the DA/SA with the attendant 2 types of trigger manipulation required. I didn't see enough of a recoil difference to make me feel it was worthwhile working through the other issues.
On the other hand I find the M&P quick to draw and very fast to manipulate. recoil is no issue. With a proper grip recoil is not an issue, the sights go up slightly and then come right back down onto the target-just like they are supposed to. I think the lack of external safeties is a big plus for me in action shooting. Just point and shoot.
On the balance I prefer the lighter plastic guns. Right now I am shooting a M&P9 and plan on buying another as a spare/backup. I also plan on picking up a M&P.45 to shoot CDP.
I would really like to try a Glock but they don't like lead bullets.
Anyhow...that's how I see it.
John
Plastic or steel?
As far as I can tell it boils down to personal preference.
I don't carry so I will leave that up to others to comment on.
For action shooting I don't think steel has quite the advantage it may have once had. During the 2008 IDPA Nationals many of the top shooters used plastic guns and some of those won their divisions.
Personally I prefer the plastic guns. I like the simplicity of the striker fired action. No external safety to contend with. Point and shoot. No doubt this is a hold-over from shooting revolvers.
I tried some steel guns but -for me- the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. I found the steel gun slower to draw and slower to drive from target to target. I also did not like the DA/SA with the attendant 2 types of trigger manipulation required. I didn't see enough of a recoil difference to make me feel it was worthwhile working through the other issues.
On the other hand I find the M&P quick to draw and very fast to manipulate. recoil is no issue. With a proper grip recoil is not an issue, the sights go up slightly and then come right back down onto the target-just like they are supposed to. I think the lack of external safeties is a big plus for me in action shooting. Just point and shoot.
On the balance I prefer the lighter plastic guns. Right now I am shooting a M&P9 and plan on buying another as a spare/backup. I also plan on picking up a M&P.45 to shoot CDP.
I would really like to try a Glock but they don't like lead bullets.
Anyhow...that's how I see it.

John


















































