Why no 22lr revolver rifle like the the TR 410

[unicorn gravedigger]

I like the TR but would like a 22 in same configuration.
Nice addition to the family

 

[Snider shooter]

Heritage wrangler. 22 lr and 22 magnum.

 

[Snider shooter]

Uberti also has Center fire models in 357, 44-40 and 45 Colt based on the SAA1873 frame. And a black powder 45 on the 1858 Remington. All non restricted.

 

[unicorn gravedigger]

I'll look into those models, thank you very much

 

[DonQuixote]

The heritage wrangler is nice because you can swap out the cylinders between .22LR and .22WMR if that seems fun to you.

 

[Snider shooter]

The heritage wrangler is nice because you can swap out the cylinders between .22LR and .22WMR if that seems fun to you.

I keep thinking of getting the 22 mag cylinder for mine but just haven’t got around to it. I have a Ruger single six with 22LR and 22 mag cylinders which I do like.

 

[Ungrateful]

I have owned almost all of them. There is a reason revolving rifles and shotguns never caught on. I always get a line of burnt arm hair right across my left forearm when I try to stabilize it and shoot it like a rifle. They are basically a handgun with a stock and should be shot that way.

I would rather have a revolver with no stock and a 26” barrel than a revolver with a stock

I have often wondered if something a bit longer than this would be non restricted in Canada

 

[mephisto002]

There is a reason why revolver rifles never caught up.

The gas and lead/copper spitting from the cylinder gap is very close to your face, and this is not only annoying, but dangerous as well.

I got rid of my Alfa Pro revolver carbine very quickly (sold at a loss) after "burning" my face.
It is impossible to shoot accurately under this circumstances.

It was a nice gun, but restricted unfortunately.