Why no Jr Carabine in .223???

Recoil-operated is not blow back, it is delayed blow back. And the AM-99 you linked is a gas operated semi auto.

Recoil operated is not delayed blowback. Short recoil sends the barrel and bolt assembly back a short ways, imparting momentum to the bolt carrier and allowing for the system to unlock and cycle. Browning machine guns employ this extensively. Long recoil involves the barrel and bolt assembly travelling all the way to the rear of the cyclic distance. Once the barrel and bolt assembly stop, the bolt is caught by a retaining device and the barrel is allowed to return to it's resting position and ejects the spent cartridge as it moves forward. Once the barrel fully returns, it deactivates the bolt retaining device and allows the bolt to move into battery, stripping and chambering a new cartridge from the magazine as well as finishing the cocking process. During both processes the firearm is in full lockup until the gas pressure has subsided.
 
Get a Keltec SU-16 and dress it up. takes LAR mags, can look almost AR-ish, can be found for $6-700 used on the EE. Folds in half for storage.

You can do this... Or beat your head against a wall while letting fistfuls of cash blow away in the wind to simulate the pain, frustration and expense of buying such a poorly designed firearm.
 
44mag is a straight walled pistol cartridge, not a shouldered rifle cartridge. The difference between 36,000 PSI(44mag) and 62,000 PSI(223) is quite substantial.

The Ruger Deerfield carbine isn't blow back either.

"The Deerfield Carbine is based on the rotating-bolt short-stroke gas-piston Mini-14 action,"
 
The Ruger Deerfield carbine isn't blow back either.

"The Deerfield Carbine is based on the rotating-bolt short-stroke gas-piston Mini-14 action,"

Thanks, the post you quoted me on I was talking about the difference in pressure between a straight walled pistol cartridge and bottle neck rifle cartridge not the design of the action. But regardless, the Ruger Deerstalker in 44 magnum is most definitely a straight blow back firearm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_Model_44

Ruger Deerstalker44.JPG
Ruger Model 44 with scope
Type Semi-automatic rifle
Place of origin United States
Production history
Designer William B. Ruger
Designed 1961
Manufacturer Sturm, Ruger
Produced 1961–1985
Variants RS, International, Sporter, 25th Anniversary
Specifications
Weight 6 lb (2.7 kg)
Length 37 in (940 mm)
Barrel length 18.5 in (470 mm)
Cartridge .44 Remington Magnum
Action Blowback
Feed system 4-round tubular magazine
Sights Gold bead
 
Thanks, the post you quoted me on I was talking about the difference in pressure between a straight walled pistol cartridge and bottle neck rifle cartridge not the design of the action. But regardless, the Ruger Deerstalker in 44 magnum is most definitely a straight blow back firearm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_Model_44

Ruger Deerstalker44.JPG
Ruger Model 44 with scope
Type Semi-automatic rifle
Place of origin United States
Production history
Designer William B. Ruger
Designed 1961
Manufacturer Sturm, Ruger
Produced 1961–1985
Variants RS, International, Sporter, 25th Anniversary
Specifications
Weight 6 lb (2.7 kg)
Length 37 in (940 mm)
Barrel length 18.5 in (470 mm)
Cartridge .44 Remington Magnum
Action Blowback
Feed system 4-round tubular magazine
Sights Gold bead

The info you quoted is wrong.

ALL the Ruger 44's were short stroke piston gas operated...from the deerstalker to the 44 carbine to the 99/44 Deerfield. I've had at least 10 and worked on many more....not blowback.
 
The info you quoted is wrong.

ALL the Ruger 44's were short stroke piston gas operated...from the deerstalker to the 44 carbine to the 99/44 Deerfield. I've had at least 10 and worked on many more....not blowback.

Thanks! I've been corrected twice this week when I was sure I was right. I've never owned one, but have always been intrigued buy the 44Mag carbines. I always thought the ruger 10/22 was a scaled down Ruger 44 in every way. It looks like the internet isn't always right lol
 
Back
Top Bottom