I find it highly unlikely you would ever find a buffer tube made from 'pot-metal'. And if you do, it won't be anodized, it will be painted.
Most of the no-name and even some name-brand buffer tubes (even ones marketed as 'mil-spec') are going to be made from 6061 aluminum as opposed to 7075. Some companies will use 6061 but machine them to 'mil-spec' sizes. How will you know the difference for sure? Easy, you won't, not unless you have a lab or a fancy handheld laser device (the actual name escapes me at the moment), and even then, you'd have to remove the anodizing to check for sure.
Why do some companies use 6061 as opposed to 7075? 6061 is half to two-thirds the cost and slightly easier on tooling.
Is 7075 better? Of course, it has a much higher tensile strength and if you were going to use your rifle as a baseball bat or a pry bar somewhere in Afghanistan, I would say go with the name brand 7075 tube. If it's a range gun, the cheaper 6061 'no-name' stock is going to be just fine.
I have both types, a mil-spec 7075 extension and a 6061 Questar 'no-name' (Korean I believe). I highly doubt that you'd ever have to worry about the threads failing on either.
At the end of the day, you buy what you want. If you have no problem paying a little bit more, pay it. It's your money. But just because something doesn't say 'mil-spec' doesn't mean it's crap.
Most of the no-name and even some name-brand buffer tubes (even ones marketed as 'mil-spec') are going to be made from 6061 aluminum as opposed to 7075. Some companies will use 6061 but machine them to 'mil-spec' sizes. How will you know the difference for sure? Easy, you won't, not unless you have a lab or a fancy handheld laser device (the actual name escapes me at the moment), and even then, you'd have to remove the anodizing to check for sure.
Why do some companies use 6061 as opposed to 7075? 6061 is half to two-thirds the cost and slightly easier on tooling.
Is 7075 better? Of course, it has a much higher tensile strength and if you were going to use your rifle as a baseball bat or a pry bar somewhere in Afghanistan, I would say go with the name brand 7075 tube. If it's a range gun, the cheaper 6061 'no-name' stock is going to be just fine.
I have both types, a mil-spec 7075 extension and a 6061 Questar 'no-name' (Korean I believe). I highly doubt that you'd ever have to worry about the threads failing on either.
At the end of the day, you buy what you want. If you have no problem paying a little bit more, pay it. It's your money. But just because something doesn't say 'mil-spec' doesn't mean it's crap.
Last edited:


















































