- Location
- West Quebec
They are even good when made by the Chinese, lol. Now that's a pretty high standard. Imagine a Glock made by Norinco?![]()
Nope I can't
They are even good when made by the Chinese, lol. Now that's a pretty high standard. Imagine a Glock made by Norinco?![]()
100 % agree...1911 was a work of a genius( JMB )
Local,
So ..... what is the greatest?
From a purpose built perspective I would say Glock. Fewest parts, simple design, to date a stellar track record, low weight, high capacity etc etc. It does as it was designed to do and does it very well.
Local
From a purpose built perspective I would say Glock. Fewest parts, simple design, to date a stellar track record, low weight, high capacity etc etc. It does as it was designed to do and does it very well.
Local
Probably 5946
Okay Sask give it up what is it lol
Lot's of other guns use internals extractors - i.e. various Sigs, early Hi-Powers, etc. The original 1911 extractor was made from spring steel and it worked just fine. Few if any modern 1911 makers, including Colt, use spring steel anymore.Yes, what indeed. Nobody else uses internal extractors.
It was indeed designed to work this way - with ball ammo. Manufacturers started mucking with the feed ramp shape because people wanted to shoot self-defence type ammo (i.e. hollow points).And consider this: the original 1911 magazine was specifically designed for a controlled feed in which the feed lips held each round in tension against the feed ramp, which was cut at a specific angle to interface with the magazine order to regulate the speed of the bullet during feeding. The surface of the feed ramp was a part of the design of the 1911.