What I've found with Vortex "haters" specifically is their experience always seems to be either secondhand or based on factory mounted (poorly mounted, at that) Crossfire II scopes (the cheapest of the lineup) which get bounced all over the world and back in rifle boxes rather than proper scope boxes.
To compete with Razor HDs, you pretty much need to run Swaro, Zeiss, or Kahles scopes. Or Nightforce. The high end of the Vortex range is really great. So are the competitors in that range. Many match winners packing that level of glass.
I use Crossfire and Diamondback scopes on my rimfires. Great scopes for 100-200m shots. Strike Eagles and Viper PSTs are great entry-level competition scopes. Viper HS scopes are fine hunting scopes but a bit chunky. Razors (both hunting and match) are just outright great, if the features fit your requirements, especially for a hunt of a lifetime, I don't think you'd be disappointed. But you'd probably be unimpressed by the lower end.
Edit: I will add that in the "low end" IMO the Burris Fullfield IV really wrecks most other scopes, cheap Vortex, ancient Bushnells people seem to have a hard-on for, low end Leupolds with horrendous turrets, other no-name brands, etc. At least the 2.5-10x is a kick-ass option and I'd run those over most anything else if the features fit.