not to be that guy, butYup heavy for caliber isn't new, and the original 303 British was 220 gr as was the 30-03, the original 30-06 was 150gr
I am currently loading 300 Norma Mag and 338 LM. Those eat up powder in shockingly large amounts. The 338 is currently consuming 105gr of powder with every trigger pull.I do love the big magnum cartridges but they sure eat up the powder quick and that s**t ain’t getting any cheaper.
Nobody suggested they are going away. The thread asked if they will undergo a resurgence ... which they will not.The standard belted magnums: 7mm Rem Mag; .300 Win Mag & .338 Win Mag aren't going away any time soon.
------------
NAA.
That is a VERY hot load.I like my 300WM, reloads driving 200grn Nosslers at 2960.
not going anywhere in my case cuz when for sale no one believed it had the value that I believe it has, to me at leastThe classic magnums probably won’t resurge but they aren’t going anywhere.
Nobody suggested they are going away. The thread asked if they will undergo a resurgence ... which they will not.
I own rifles in both of the Mauser Calibers. While marketers would have us doubt their effectiveness, they are both very capable. I also have a 9.3 x 57 which I consider an early, non belted magnum, which seems to be gaining traction not only here but on YouTube. The Jonny come lately cartridges have neither the track record nor the familiarity of what might now be called classics.I agree, handloading is a must, and I’d rather not have to worry about trying to thread the needle of making a belted mag headspace on the shoulder instead of the belt. I can’t see them being able to re-market a belt on a case, which has long been known to not add any strength to the case whatsoever.
The 6.5x55 and the 7x57 both have to much body taper and not enough shoulder angle. I’m not sure they were so much designed for heavy bullets, or not in the way we speak of it nowadays. A 220 in a 30-06 is not seated at the neck shoulder junction.
Again, as a reloader these are not attractive attributes. I’d rather shoot and reload cartridges that were designed to minimize brass flow, maximize powder column etc.
I agree, handloading is a must, and I’d rather not have to worry about trying to thread the needle of making a belted mag headspace on the shoulder instead of the belt. I can’t see them being able to re-market a belt on a case, which has long been known to not add any strength to the case whatsoever.
I am currently loading 300 Norma Mag and 338 LM. Those eat up powder in shockingly large amounts. The 338 is currently consuming 105gr of powder with every trigger pull.![]()
And when you’ve done that you’re sure the belt is not in contact with the chamber?Why would you have to worry about " threading the needle" of making a belted magnums head space off the shoulder?
It would be the exact same method as a 308 or any non rimmed/belted case. Just don't push the shoulder back so far. Shoot ammo push should back 0.001" now it head spaces on the shoulder.
I do it with 303 British and 375hh. Just poke the should back enough so you can close the bolt with little resistance does not matter about the rim, rebaited or semi or even a belt.
Correct, I agree with all the points made.And when you’ve done that you’re sure the belt is not in contact with the chamber?
The belt on a belted magnum has ZERO upside. It does nothing except potentially cause a concentricity problem. The only reason to buy one is you already have dies and components or loaded ammo.
The one I always see in a LH magnum is 7mm rem mag, then 300WM, I was thinking of grabbing a LH magnum for a bit but went a different and more interesting route as far as I’m concerned. I’ll grab a LH 300WM this year if something interesting pops up.That said, I am in the market for a used LH magnum, and the availability today vs a few years ago seems to be much much lower. I haven't seen a cheap LH 300wm Savage on the EE in a while and they used to be pretty common.